Thread: Jack Weinzierl Threatened and Tim Darnell Sued Soapboxmom / Heather Dobrott in District Court & Lost in Summary Judgment

Jack Weinzierl sent e-mails and made posts on Scam threatening to sue me declaring there will be accountability. Tim Darnell filed the frivolous suit in Dallas District Court and Judge Carl Ginsberg laughed him out of the courtroom with a take nothing Summary Judgment.

2009-03-17-Order Granting Dobrott Summary Judgment.pdf

2008-02-24-Dobrott's Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf

2009-04-08-Dobrott Motion for Sanctions.pdf

Soapboxmom

From: jack@advantageconferences.com
To: soapboxmom@hotmail.com
Subject: Heather, you leave us no option
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:08:49 -0500

Message
Heather, you leave us no option. I trust that you are prepared to face the consequences for your continued actionable statements and actions.

In Service,

Jack

From: jack@advantageconferences.com
To: soapboxmom@hotmail.com
Subject: Heather, our church leadership
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:59:54 -0500

Message
Heather, I want to thank you for sharing your hate-filled and incorrect email with our church leadership. A request just got posted for collective prayer for you. Forgiveness is a wonderful thing whether it is asked for or not, and so is accountability for your actions. You will be held accountable.

In Service,

Jack

From: acscammed@mail.com
To: soapboxmom@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:41:25 -0500




My love to each of you this morning! We are full-steam ahead and anticipate an excellent, exciting conference weekend after next!



See: Titus I:15 “To the pure, all things are pure, but to those who are corrupted and do not believe, nothing is pure. In fact, both their minds and consciences are corrupted. 16 They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny Him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good.”



With business, we have wonderful times of fulfillment, fellowship, and reward. We also have times where we have to deal with unsavory situations and even ‘dark’ characters. This communication is for internal use (Advantage Conferences Reps) only. You have a non-disclosure responsibility regarding all postings from corporate to the field. Please read the following carefully.



Many of you are aware that we have faced opposition from loosely organized attackers, people vehemently opposed to our concept and growth – determined to do everything possible to undermine every aspect of our ministry and business. They have anonymously demonized, mischaracterized, and found fault with virtually every single announcement, initiative, and direction we’ve taken, and through a barrage of communications, have been effective in thwarting our efforts to some extent. However, that situation has taken on an interesting and significant development this week.



We are pleased to announce that the identity of one of the most vocal ‘belligerents’ to AC has been uncovered. Operating anonymously, an outspoken individual who has called herself, Soapboxmom, has organized an ongoing, destructive assault on the AC business. She has also assassinated the personas and character of myself and several AC leaders and our families for over two years now with inflammatory, disgusting, always completely negative blogs, messages, and phone calls. She has been identified as a Heather Dobrott from Garland, Texas. This, to say the least, ‘misguided’ woman has been quite vigorous in her attacks, and while I don’t mind disagreement regarding our being a Christ-centered company, how we market, or the validity of our concept, products, opportunity, and compensation structure, etc., her efforts have far exceeded the boundaries of civil discourse. Her opposition has now crossed the line, turning to legal, actionable events.



Here is where you come in. Several Representatives and Mindset Mentors (guest speakers) have been contacted by her. If you have had any contact with this person, you are obligated to provide a complete, comprehensive, and detailed report regarding any aspect of “soapboxmom” contact and/or communication in writing. You will need to send those via e-mail to office@AdvantageConferences.com. Please include dates and the nature and content of her communication(s) with you. While we regret the inconvenience, we are thankful for the opportunity to put a stop to the incessant and vitriolic poison that this woman has spewed over the last two years.



While I have, personally, for the most part, ignored most of her efforts, which have actually included her literal stalking of our homes, my attendance at recreational events, and our public conference events, the time has come to deal decisively with this self-appointed enemy to our company and cause.



Again, I apologize for having to even bring this up, but we can’t ignore these ridiculous assaults any longer. IMPORTANT: your participation is not optional. You are obligated to issue a full report regarding any past, present or future dealings with “soapboxmom” via e-mail, phone, personal meetings, or any type of communication – in detail. I am also compelled to state that withholding, or not fully complying with this request – not reporting any information of this sort could indicate complicity on your part and create further problems for you personally. Even if your involvement has simply been to look up postings on one of the negative blogs, you must report what, when, where, and the effect the postings had on you personally and/or on your Candidates.



Forwarding any internal AC communications to other non-AC parties, other than the Messenger, Company approved public broadcasts, or a generic “ministry oriented” communiqué is strictly prohibited. While this should be understood without an announcement to that effect, forwarding, disclosing, or sending messages that are private to our company, staff, or Representative team is a serious violation of corporate trust and unfortunately could require action against any Representatives who have been engaged in such activity.



On the positive side – let’s make MMC, Number Six, the very best event possible! I am highly encouraged and excited, and I look forward to seeing each of you there. I’ve got a special hug just for you!



Blessings,

That is the hearing where Timmy's temporary psychotic injunction was dissolved.
CAUSE NO. 08-06317

TIM DARNELL

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff,

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
v.

HEATHER DOBROTT

Defendant.

193 rd.JUDICIAL DISTRICT

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

On this 9 day of June, Plaintiff Tim Darnell, having presented

to the Court Plaintiff’ Application for Injunctive Relief

(the "Application") as set forth in Plaintiff s Original Petition

and Application for Injunctive Relief (the "Petition") filed with

the Court in the above-referenced action, and the Court,

having considered the facts set forth in the Application, and

the applicable law, finds that a Temporary Restraining Order

should be granted against Defendant Heather Dobrott in order

to prevent immediate and irreparable harm, injury, loss, or

damage to Plaintiff, as set forth in the Petition and Application.

The Court finds that without the issuance of an injunction or

restraining order, Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed by, among

other things, the fact that (1) he will have no means of

preventing future disparaging remarks from Defendant or the

current comments that are ongoing torts; (2) he will be

unable to discourage Defendant from bragging about

committing torts against Plaintiff on the internet and

encouraging others to commit torts; (3) he will be unable to

understand the number of defamatory acts (and to whom

they are communicated to) and will lose an incalculable and

unknown amount of business; (4) he may have to suffer from

further harms to his reputation and cancel an upcoming

conference; (5) he will be unable to ever know the

extent of loss of their reputation or which clients were

affected by this and will be unable to calculate the losses and

be awarded sufficient monetary damages; and (6) he will be

unable to prevent future invasions of his and his family's

privacy and confrontations involving Defendant discussing

Plaintiff to third parties.

The Court, having found that Plaintiff has demonstrated the

likelihood of success on the merits of their claims and a

balancing of the equities favoring the issuance of a

Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary

Injunction against Defendant to prevent immediate and

irreparable harm or damage to Plaintiff, orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, for a period not to exceed fourteen (14) days

after the signing of this Temporary Restraining Order,

Heather Dobrott, including her parents, subsidiaries, affiliates,

officers, agents, directors, servants, employees, attorneys,

and all those persons in active concert or participation with

Defendant, are hereby restrained and/or ordered to perform

as follows:

A. Restrained from any action relating to Plaintiff that

constitutes defamation, invasion of privacy or any other

torts.

B. Restrained from coming within one thousand feet of

Plaintiff's home, business, or locations of meetings that are

not held open to the general public.

C. Restrained from making any communications that result in

either Defendant or the third party making statements as to

Plaintiff's mental health, finances, family, honesty, and

intelligence and restrained from encouraging third parties to

commit torts against Plaintiff.

D. Restrained from making any communications (whether

orally, via facsimile, via telephone, written, on the internet, or

emails) relating to Plaintiff, Plaintiff's attorneys, and Plaintiff's

family), excluding all communications to or from her attorney

or any communications with the police that Defendant feels is

necessary.

E. Restrained from discussing this litigation with third parties

other than her attorney.

F. Ordered to not dispose of any evidence or records relating

to this case, including information identifying the address,

name, and phone numbers of the individuals that she has

made communications to regarding Plaintiff or his business.

G. Restrained from discussing plans with third parties to visit

Plaintiff or confront Plaintiff's Church, friends, family, pastor,

daughter's high school, or other locations related to Plaintiffs

life in Allen.

H. Restrained from visiting Plaintiffs home, Plaintiffs Church,

friends, family, pastor, daughter's high school, or other

locations related to Plaintiffs life in Allen.

1. Restrained from hiding out or spying upon Plaintiff from a distance.

J. Restrained from contacting Plaintiffs business under a

pseudonym or discussing Plaintiff or his business with third

parties using a pseudonym.

K. Restrained from contacting third parties and suggesting

that it is appropriate for anyone, including herself, to contact

anyone at Plaintiff s daughter's school regarding Plaintiff.

1. Restrained from discussing how she humiliated Plaintiffs

family at Allen High School.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiffs shall execute and file

a bond to the Defendant with the Clerk of the Court in the

amount of $ 100.00_ as security before issuance of the

Temporary Restraining Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Rayford Defendants shall

appear before the Court in the Courtroom of the

193 Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, in the City

of Dallas, Texas, at 3: 30 o' clock, p.m., on the 23 day

of June, 2008, for a hearing on Plaintiffs Application for

Temporary Injunction to reign effective until final decree

thereof.

SIGNED, this 9 day of June, 2008 at 3:00 o’clock, p.m.

Judge Presiding

JUDGE 192nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SITTING FOR JUDGE 193rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS The judge dissolved the order. Timmy got nothing, nada, zip----exactly zero of what he requested!


Soapboxmom

CAUSE NO.

TIM DARNELL

Plaintiff,
v.

HEATHER DOBROTT

Defendant.

08-06317
§ § § § § § § § §

IN THE DISTRICT COURT
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
L-193rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

COMES NOW, Tim Darnell ("Plaintiff' or "Darnell") and hereby

files this, Plaintiffs Original Petition and Application for

Injunctive Relief against Heather Dobrott and respectfully

shows this Court as follows:

I.

Discovery Control Plan

1. Discovery is to be conducted under a Level Two Discovery

Control Plan, as provided by Rule 190.2 ofthe Texas Rules of

Civil Procedure.

II.

Parties

2. Tim Darnell is an individual residing at 1513 Homepark Drive,

Allen, Texas 75002, in Collin County, Texas.

3. Defendant Heather Dobrott is an individual residing in Dallas

County, Texas. Ms. Dobrott may be served at her residence

of Garland, Texas 75044.

III.

Venue and Jurisdiction

proper in Dallas County, Texas because a substantial part of

the events or omissions giving rise to the claim

occurred in Dallas County, Texas.

5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over all parties.

6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s

damages are in excess of the minimum jurisdictional

requirements of this Court.

IV.

Factual Allegations

A. Defendant has posted many defamatory comments

regarding Plaintiff on the internet.

7. Defendant Dobrott has had a history of posting comments

regarding Plaintiff on the internet. Although Defendant

Dobrott and Plaintiff have never met and Plaintiff never

engaged in any commercial transactions with Defendant,

Defendant appears to be obsessed with discussing Plaintiff

with third parties or posting defamatory and untrue

statements regarding Plaintiff on various websites.

B. Defendant has escalated her defamatory comments to

include individual solicitations of third parties and

proactively trying to harm Plaintiff's economic and personal

interests.

8. Defendant Dobrott's obsession with Plaintiff has continued

to escalate to new and dangerous levels. Defendant's

obsession devolved to the point whereby she prepared an

action plan involving many of Plaintiff's personal and business

contacts and began calling them one after another to

dissuade them from associating with Plaintiff and to persuade

them to not honor prior speaking engagements that they had

made with regards to Plaintiff's business. Defendant

researched and either created or maintained data relating to

many individuals who were going to fly into town and speak to

many individuals for the benefit of Plaintiff's reputation and

Plaintiff's business. Defendant contacted many of

these individuals and convinced them that Plaintiff fit the

description of the person that she described on her

webpages. Many of these individuals were made

uncomfortable and chose to no longer affiliate with Plaintiff

or Defendant.

C. Defendant has escalated her prior statements and actions

with statements that she has intended to

commit additional torts, which also involve Plaintiffs minor

daughters at their school.

9. Defendant's obsession with Plaintiff led Defendant to make

many threats to Plaintiff and his family, including threats to

confront Plaintiff's minor daughters at their schools and

discuss openly with third parties any and all opinions that

Defendant has of Plaintiff.

10. Such communications are not privileged, are not

appropriate for the time, place, and manner, and are likely to

cause irreparable harm to the family relationship.

D. Defendant's statements harm Plaintiff's reputation and

because of the nature of the statements and

webpostings, others are encouraged to also state defamatory

comments and Plaintiff is unable to determine

who heard these statements.

11. The actions of Defendant caused Plaintiff to suffer

damages. Plaintiff's name, when searched on the internet, is

immediately affiliated with one of Defendant's po stings on

several websites that contain false and misleading statements

regarding him. Defendant's activities are such that they

prevent Plaintiff from knowing when he was defamed, which

individual was told defamatory things about him, and

the extent of the untrue things that were stated. The nature

of slander is such that once a person learns

something terrible regarding a third party, they tend to either

permanently lose confidence in that person or

they disseminate the information to the next person within

the information chain. Additionally, humans tend

to gossip and defamation on a website encourages others to

make defamatory comments. Since only

Defendant knows the location, frequency, and extent of her

postings, and since she knows that the internet

provides a sort of anonymity for slanderers, Defendant's acts

are such that she knows that she can harm

Plaintiff without Plaintiff knowing that he has lost the

confidence or trust of another person.

Plaintiff will be unable to calculate the loss of the damages

and without injunctive relief, Plaintiff will be afforded no

adequate remedy at law.

E. Defendant threatened on many occasions to confront

additional people regarding Plaintiff and has carried out that

threat, even at Plaintiff's minor daughters' school.

The affidavit of Tim Darnell establishes that Defendant has

bragged about going to Plaintiff s daughter's school and

speaking to many individuals as to how bad she believes

Plaintiff to be.

v.

Defamation

12. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full.

13. The acts of Defendant give rise to a cause of action of

defamation because:

a. The Defendant published a statement.

b. The statement referred to Plaintiff.

c. The statement was defamatory.

d. The statement was false.

e. With regard to the truth of the statement, the Defendant

was acting with malice; negligent; or liable without regard to

fault; and

The Plaintiff suffered pecuniary injury or injury is presumed.

VI.

C. The Defendant published the words with malice;

d. The Defendant published the words without privilege; and

e. The publication caused special damages.

VII.

Negligence

16. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if set out in full.

17. The conduct of Defendant constitutes negligence because:

a. Defendant owed a duty to Plaintiff;

b. Defendant breached that duty;

c. Defendant's breach of that duty proximately caused

damages to Plaintiff; and These damages were foreseeable.

VIII.

Tortious Interference with an existing contract

18. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full.

19. The conduct of Defendant constitutes tortious

interference with an existing contract because:

a. Plaintiff had valid contracts;

b. The Defendant willfully and intentionally interfered with

that contract;

c. The interference was a proximate cause of Plaintiffs injury;

and

d. Plaintiff incurred actual damage or loss.

IX.

Tortious Interference with a Prospective Contract

20. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full.

The conduct of Defendant constitutes tortuous interference

with a prospective contact because:

a. There was a reasonable probability that Plaintiff would

have entered into a business relationship with a third person;

b. The Defendant willfully and intentionally interfered with

that relationship;

c. The Defendant's conduct was independently tortious or

unlawful;

d. The interference was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injury; and

e. Plaintiff incurred actual damage or loss. x.

Invasion of Privacy

22. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full. The conduct of Defendant gives rise to a

cause of action of invasion of privacy, whereas the Defendant

intentionally intruded on Plaintiff's solitude, seclusion, or

private affairs; the intrusion would be highly

offensive to a reasonable person; and the Plaintiff suffered an

injury.

XI.

Attorneys' Fees

23. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full.

24. As a result of the acts and omissions of Defendant,

Plaintiff has engaged the undersigned counsel and

have agreed to pay counsel's reasonable attorneys' fees and

costs and expenses associated with advancing the claims in

this lawsuit.

25. Plaintiff seeks to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees

and expenses against

Defendants.

XII.

26. Plaintiff incorporates herein the paragraphs above as if

set out in full.

27. In support of this Application, Plaintiff refers to and

incorporates by reference the affidavit of Tim Darnell.

By reason of the acts and practices of Defendant, as more

fully set forth hereinabove, Plaintiff is suffering

and will continue to suffer, incalculable financial loss and

irreparable injuries to himself, his family, and

reputation for which there is no remedy at law.

28. Pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 680, Plaintiff is

entitled to injunctive relief against Defendant Heather

Dobrott. An imminent threat exists that Defendant will

continue to disparage and defame Defendant and irreparably

damage his reputation and continue to encourage third

parties to commit torts by discussing her own. Plaintiff has no

adequate remedy at law and irreparable harm will result to

Plaintiff if Defendant is not restrained.

29. Without an injunction issued by this Court, Plaintiff will be

irreparably harmed by, among other things, the fact that (1)

he will have no means of preventing future disparaging

remarks from Defendant or the current comments that are

ongoing torts; (2) he will be unable to discourage

Defendant from bragging about committing torts against

Plaintiff on the internet and encouraging others to

do so; (3) he will be unable to understand the number of

defamatory acts and will lose an incalculable and

unknown amount of business; (4) he may have to suffer from

further harms to his reputation and cancel an

upcoming conference; (5) he will be unable to ever know the

extent of loss of their reputation or which clients

were affected by this and will be unable to calculate the

losses and be awarded sufficient monetary

damages; and (6) he will be unable to prevent future

invasions of his and his family's privacy and

confrontations involving Defendant discussing Plaintiff to third

parties. These restrictions are designed to be

the least invasive restrictions of Defendant's right to speak or

travel.

30. By virtue of the foregoing, Plaintiff has demonstrated the

likelihood of success on the merits of their claims and a

balancing of the equities favoring the issuance of a

Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction

against Defendant. Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court

issue a Temporary Restraining Order and that Heather

Dobrott, her agents and attorneys any other person

or entity acting in concert with or on behalf of Heather

Dobrott, receive an order:

A. Restraining Defendant from any action relating to Plaintiff

that constitutes defamation, invasion of privacy or any other

torts.

B. Restraining Defendant from coming to Plaintiff s home,

business, or locations of meetings that are not held open to

the general public.

C. Restraining Defendant from any gossiping that results in

either Defendant or the third party making statements as to

Plaintiffs mental health, finances, family, honesty, and

intelligence.

D. Restraining Defendant from making any communications

(whether orally, via facsimile, via telephone, written, on the

internet, or emails) relating to Plaintiff, Plaintiff s attorneys,

and Plaintiffs family), excluding all communications to or from

her attorney or any communications with the police that

Defendant feels is necessary.

E. Restraining Defendant from discussing this litigation with

third parties other than her attorney.

F. Ordering Defendant to not dispose of any evidence or

records relating to this case, including information identifying

the address, name, and phone numbers of the individuals that

she has made communications to regarding Plaintiff or his

business.

G. Restraining Defendant from discussing plans with third

parties to visit Plaintiff or confront Plaintiffs Church, friends,

family, pastor, daughter's high school, or other locations

related to Plaintiff’s life in Allen.

H. Restraining Defendant from visiting Plaintiffs home.

Plaintiff’s Church, friends, family, Pastor, daughter's high

school, or other locations related to Plaintiff's life in Allen.

1. Restraining Defendant from hiding out or spying upon

Plaintiff from a distance.

J. Restraining Defendant from contacting Plaintiff s business

under a pseudonym or discussing Plaintiff or his business with

third parties using a pseudonym.

K. Restraining Defendant from contacting third parties and

suggesting that it is appropriate for anyone, including herself,

to contact anyone at Plaintiff's daughter's school regarding

Plaintiff.

L. Restraining Defendant from discussing how she humiliated

Plaintiff's family at Allen High School.

XIII.

Conditions Precedent

31. All conditions precedent to recovery for the release

sought herein have been satisfied.

XIV.

Exemplary Damages

32. Plaintiff incorporates all other facts of this petition. These

facts demonstrate that Defendants acted with the culpable

mental state to entitle Plaintiff to exemplary damages and

Plaintiff prays for the same.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Tim Darnell prays that Heather Dobrott

be ordered to appear in these proceedings

and thereafter Plaintiffs recover against Defendant as follows:

injunctive relief as prayed for herein, damage

in excess of the Court's minimum jurisdictional limits, including

exemplary damages, statutory pre and post

judgment interest allowed at the maximum legal rates;

reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees; and for

such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate

and necessary.


Respectfully submitted,

CIAROCHI AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC
800 E. Campbell Rd. Ste. 121
Richardson, TX 75081
Telephone: 214-393-6861
Facsimile: 214- 66-6297
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF TIM DARNELL

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULES

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge Heather Dobrott is not represented by counsel in the matter made the basis of this suit.

I certify that to the best of my knowledge, this case
is not subject to transfer under Local Rule 1.06.

Jason Charles Ciarochi

CAUSE NO. 08-06317

TIM DARNELL

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

Plaintiff,

§ § § § § § § § §
v.
HEATHER DOBROTT

Defendant.

L-193 JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AFFIDAVIT OF TIM DARNELL

STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS §

Before me, the undersigned authority, duly appeared Tim

Darnell, who being first by me duly sworn, did depose and

state as follows:

1. "My name is Tim Darnell. I am over the age of eighteen (

18) years old and suffer from no legal or mental disabilities. I

have never been convicted of a felony or a crime

involving moral turpitude, and am competent to testify as to

the matters set forth in this affidavit. I have personal

knowledge of the facts stated in this affidavit and Plaintiff's

Original Petition and they are true, personally known to me,

and correct.

2. "I was forced to file this lawsuit to the stop actions of

Heather Dobrott because they are escalating into worse and

worse situations. In short, I am asking this Court to

enter an order preventing Ms. Dobrott from contacting me or

my family, to cease having discussions on the internet of

meeting my minor daughters at their schools and when I

cannot watch them, to remove all of the prior discussions of

me, my family, and my business from the internet, to cease

encouraging third parties to have devious thoughts of

illicit activities directed towards me and my family, and to

cease publishing statements regarding me or my family that

are untrue. Ultimately, I want this court to determine that the

facts and evidence necessitate a ruling that Ms. Dobrott must

stay out of my and my family's affairs and move on to her life

and not be allowed to discuss me to third parties at all.

Whatever rights she may have had to be critical of me have

long since expired at some point after she continuously posts

information suggesting that 1 am dishonest, a bad family

member, a horrible person, insane, and unintelligent. At a

certain point, continuing insults and defamatory statements,

especially when followed by public confrontations with third

parties, has to be stopped before it escalates any worse.

Otherwise, the law will not protect individuals from continuous

interference. Even the rights of dissenting opinions have to be

limited when those speaking demonstrate a pattern and

practice of vicious, untrue, and defamatory statements,

especially when these discussions encourage others to take

action and the speaker themselves takes inappropriate

actions.

3. "1 have never met Defendant face to face. I could not

identify her in a room with twenty people. As far as 1 am

aware, I have never attempted to sell goods or services to

Defendant and I do not know what made her start obsessing

about me. I have never been in a contract or prospective

contract with Defendant and she is not known to be at my

church or to live by my. Regardless, from the data on the

internet, it appears that since September of2005 (33 months

ago) Dobrott has evidently authored more than 1900 web

postings related to me (the current court, as seen the

postings themselves is 1966), which come out to

approximately two entries for every day since then! Because

the 75 pages of threads are so long and voluminous,

especially when printed out, I did not hand count these

entries and I assume that she has not identified other targets

that she posts on daily in this total figure. This Court

represents the only forum that I have to find some way to

prevent Dobrott from continuing to obsess about my life and

encouraging others to do so.
.

4. "Although I am apparently a daily point of discussion for

Defendant, I have not posted responses to her numerous

messages relating to me on the websites that she uses to

defame me. I do not want to encourage her activities.

However, she still writes on the internet as if we have an

ongoing dialogue and as if! have recently spoken to her

directly. 5. "Defendant has discussed me with respect of

almost all of the traditional means of slandering someone,

referring to mental illness, dishonesty, a lack of intelligence,

financial problems, and family problems. In case it is not clear,

I do not believe that it is true that I suffer from an illness or

disease, I am fairly honest and fairly intelligent, and my family

and I are getting along. I do not think that she has a right to

discuss these topics and she should not be allowed to discuss

the topics as some sort of means of legitimatizing whatever

other opinions she has about me or my business. Because

there are almost 2000 web po stings related to Defendant,

who goes by the pseudonym "Soapboxmom," I have

attempted to identify a few of these instances for ease of

reference and understanding.

A. False references to mental illness

6. I have been described as "the king of mentally ill martyrs"

as well as "sick and dangerous .. .insane and delusional." See

Exhibit A, a true and correct copy of a web posting by

Defendant. Defendant has compared my personality to

Charles Mansion, a known murderer and sociopath. See Exhibit

B, a true and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant.

B. False references to my character and truthfulness

7. Defendant has frequently referred to me as a liar,

dishonest dirtbag, and the king of spin on the internet. See

Exhibit C, E, and F, true and correct copies of web po stings

by Defendant. Defendant sees fit to tell third parties that I

am "Satan on earth." See Exhibit C. Defendant has attributed

statements to me that I have not made, such as suggesting

that I have promised $ 100,000 to $ 1,000,000 to the

individuals who join my business; I have never made such

statements. See Exhibit K, a true and correct copy of a web

posting by Defendant. Defendant has accused me of a crime -

of collecting and personally keeping money that is to be used

to benefit others; I have not kept the money that we

earmarked for the poor or other causes. See Exhibit L, a true

and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant.

C. False references to my intelligence

8. Defendant has said that I do not have the intelligence of a

head of cabbage. See Exhibit H, a true and correct copy of a

web posting by Defendant. D. False references to my finances

9. Defendant has falsely portrayed me as someone who held

one third of the shares of a company in bankruptcy, which is

not true. See Exhibit G, a true and correct copy of a web

posting by Defendant. Defendant has falsely portrayed, on

more than one occasion that I do not pay my bills and

suggested that I did not pay for a hotel bill that I paid for.

See Exhibit J, a true and correct copy of a web posting by

Defendant.

E. False references to my family

lOa. Defendant has inferred that I have a spouse who thinks

that I am stupid and inept.

See Exhibit D, a true and correct copy of a web posting by

Defendant.

lOb. I am asking the court for relief because Defendant's

conduct has escalated beyond the daily internet insults.

Defendant has acted on her statements, including

using false names to contact individuals I know and tell them

untrue and bad things about me.

11. "Defendant has taken it upon herself to contact third

parties regarding me under a false name; Defendant has

admitted to contacting my business affiliates, churches, and

advertisers under the pseudonym Elizabeth. See Exhibit B, a

true and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant.

12a. "Prior to the last business conference, Defendant took it

upon herself to obtain a list of individuals who may attend or

speak at my conference. She then contacted these

individuals and told them not to affiliate with me. Defendant

acted with the purpose of trying to dissuade speakers to not

come to conventions. Defendant even posted on the internet,

during the time of the conference, that her goal was to "stop

this conference." See Exhibit I, a true and correct copy of a

web posting by Defendant. Several of these individuals were

made uncomfortable and some chose to not speak to me after

her call. She actually dissuaded some speakers, who had

agreements to come and speak, to not come because of her.

Sometimes, when individuals are difficult to deal with, people

just choose to avoid the unpleasant situation entirely.

12b. It is disturbing that Defendant does appear to have the

characteristics of a "stalker;" Without identifying herself,

Defendant evidently physically appeared at one of the

conferences and even put photographs of it up on the net.

We did not know that Defendant came out to see us at the

conference. We did not learn of it until afterwards, when

pictures appeared on the internet and she later acknowledged

that she was there.

13a. "Defendant has falsely accused me of stating that I

received death threats from her specifically, which I have not

stated, and seems to think that my wife, parents, pastors,

and friends should be involved in her world because of her

beliefs. See Exhibit M, a true and correct copy of a web

posting by Defendant. Here, Defendant specifically discusses

going to my daughter's school and my church and handing out

packets that refer to me. During my lifetime, I have received

death threats. I am not in the habit of discussing Defendant

often and although she did call, bother, and threaten

scheduled speakers who were planning on attending the

conference, I did not state that she threatened lives over

this.

13b. However, Defendant has responded on message threads

with the title of "When I found Jack Weinzerl, I will kill him

myself." Defendant does not oppose violent messages

directed towards me or towards others that have interactions

with my business, including Jack Weinzieral. See Exhibit P, a

true and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant.

13c. On March 19,2008, Defendant has even stated on the

internet that she will go to the school of my minor children

and confront them with information regarding me. See Exhibit

M, a true and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant. 13

d. On March 19, 2008, Defendant has identified my wife and

children by their first names and suggested that she has to

contact them, apparently for the "safety of [Defendant's]

family." See Exhibit M, a true and correct copy of a web

posting by Defendant.

14. "On April 23, 2008, Defendant said that she would go to

Plaintiff's minor

daughter's high school. See Exhibit 0, a true and correct copy

of a web posting by Defendant at page 3.

15. "On or about May 8, 2008, additional web dialogues

continued regarding visiting my daughter's school; based on

the discussion Defendant had to know of the

social and gossip implications of approaching Allen High School

with defamatory information regarding my and my family. See

Exhibit P, true and correct copies of web postings by

Defendants and others at page 10.

On May 12, 2008, Defendant said that she actually went to

the school of my minor daughters (Allen High School) and had

a discussion with the "School Resource Officers," office

personnel and the principal regarding me, with copies of

current and former lawsuits and that she had hoped that it

was enough "public humiliation" for me. See Exhibit N, a true

and correct copy of a web posting by Defendant at page 15 of

42.

16. "On May 21, 2008, Defendant again references a "long

afternoon at your [Plaintiff's] daughters' school" and states, "I

would think that you would be horrified to humiliate your girls

like that." See Exhibit N, a true and correct copy of a web

posting by Defendant at page 36 of 42.

17. "On May 24, 2008, Defendant again references fighting

allegations of "stalking" and states that she feels she is

forced to "continue fighting those allegations at the places of

his children go." See Exhibit N, a true and correct copy of a

web posting by Defendant at page 41 of 42.

18. "Overall, the pattern of several hundred web postings,

using false names, making at least two public appearances (at

the business conference and that the high school), stating

false and harmful things about me and my family, suggests

that my family and 1 need a restraining order or injunction to

get Defendant to stop attempting to interfere in my life.

19. "I am not a licensed medical professional to offer a formal

opinion on Defendant, but at some point, nearly daily focus

and obsession upon someone that you were never

really close to is just not a healthy practice. I have tried to

ignore this issue for a long time, but I must get judicial

information once personal visitations occur. I am very

uncomfortable that Defendant feels that going to my

daughter's school is normal or healthy. Whether she feels that

she is in danger or whether she feels that she is media hero,

she has already availed herself to authorities on many levels

and they should be acting on her theories, not her.

20. "Additionally, the above patterns of strange behavior,

illicit behavior, and hate all demonstrate that she is using the

web postings to encourage others to take extreme steps like

she is. Allowing her po stings to stay and allowing her to

continue to post her new intrusions into my life encourage

third parties to violate the law as well. Defendant is

attempting to use illegal activities as a way of legitimatizing

all of her other opinions and issues and she should not be

allowed to do so. She should not be allowed to harass my

family at my daughter's school and she should not be allowed

to suggest to third parties that it is normal, legal, and healthy

when it is not.

21. "Defendant does not own the website that she posts on

scam. com. She does not get an economic benefit from

posting these materials to receive advertising dollars or any

other economic benefit from putting her statements on the

website. Thus, any restraint on her ability to post on the site

should not cost her any money during the TRO period.

Application of facts towards the application for temporary

restraining order and permanent injunction.

22. "The above facts indicate that there is (l) a cause of

action; (2) a probable right of relief; (3) imminent and

irreparable injury and no adequate remedy at law; and (4) a

willingness to post bond.

A. A cause of action and probable right of relief

"With the above facts, I am likely to recover from Heather

Dobrott for defamation, business disparagement, negligence,

invasion of privacy, and tortious interference. B. Imminent

and irreparable injury and no adequate remedy at law

Without this Court's relief, I am going to continue to suffer

injuries. Defendant has demonstrated that she is willing to

defame me and invade my privacy on a daily basis. Without

an order limiting Defendant's ability to discuss me with third

parties, post information on the internet, have impromptu

meetings at my daughter's school or encourage others to

defame or harm me, Defendant will continue to harm me and

my family's reputation, potentially resulting in a terrible

situation. I am not even able to know how many individuals

have read these web po stings and how many other

individuals she will talk to. Defendant's activities are such

that she is able to engage in a course of conduct whereby I

will not be able to know how often defamatory information

regarding me is communicated and I cannot know the

recipient in order to help my reputation. Defendant's activities

harm my reputation and make me unable to calculate and

know the damages without an order enjoining the activities.

Defendant needs to be restrained before she encourages any

others to insult me on the internet, as they have in the past.

C. Willingness to post bond

23. "I am willing to post a bond to procure a temporary

restraining order. The bond should be nominal, if any, whereas

Defendant is not receiving any economic benefit from the web

postings, spying on me, going to my daughter's school, and

encouraging others to insult me.

24. "I request that this court issue a temporary restraining

order requiring the following:

A. Restraining Defendant from any action relating to me that

constitutes defamation, invasion of privacy or any other

torts.

B. Restraining Defendant from coming within one thousand

feet of my home, church, business, or locations of meetings

that I am attending that are not held open to the general

public.

C. Restraining Defendant from any communications that result

in either Defendant or the third party making statements

relating to me and health, mental health, finances, family,

character, honesty, criminal allegations, business acumen, or

intelligence.

D. Restraining Defendant from making any communications

(whether orally, via facsimile, via telephone, written, on the

internet, or emails) relating to me, my attorneys, and my

family, excluding all communications to or from her attorney or

any communications with the police.

E. Restraining Defendant from discussing this litigation with

third parties other than her attorney.

F. Ordering Defendant to not dispose of any evidence or

records relating to this case, including information identifying

the address, name, and phone numbers of the individuals that

she has made communications to regarding me.

G. Restraining Defendant from encouraging third parties to

take actions that are illicit or harmful to Plaintiff, including

discussing plans with third parties to visit me or confront my

Church, friends, family, pastor, daughter's high school, or

other locations related to my life in Allen.

H. Restraining Defendant from contacting my business

contacts, family members, Church members, friends, family,

pastor, individuals located at daughters' or son's school, or

other individuals connected to my life in Allen.

1. Restraining Defendant from hiding out and spying upon me

from a distance.

J. Restraining Defendant from contacting my business under a

pseudonym or discussing me or my business with third parties

using a pseudonym.

K. Restraining Defendant from contacting third parties and

suggesting that it is appropriate for anyone, including herself,

to contact anyone at my daughters' school

regarding me.

L. Restraining Defendant from discussing how she humiliated

my family at Allen High School.

25. "Without a restraining order and permanent injunction, I

will be unable to calculate my damages. At the permanent

injunction hearing, I will request that the Court

issue an order requiring Defendant to make applications for

delistings and removal all internet references to me, my

family, and my business.

"FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT."

Tim Darnell

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF
COUNTY OF DALLAS
§ §

This instrument was acknowledged before me on June 6, 2008 by Tim Darnell.

CLAUDIA SANCHEZ
Notary Public, State of Texas
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _________________________________________
Tim Darnell lost in Summary Judgment. He was too chicken to show up for the hearing. He never turned over any discovery whatsoever. He never identified a single false statement of fact by me that he could refute. He stiffed his attorney 20 grand and didn't pay the court reporter. He was proven to be a vicious liar. The death threats and stalking he swore responsiblity for he had to swear never happened later in the case as he had zero evidence of his delusional rantings. He and Jack Weinzierl published all those lies and went down in flames. I expect a full retraction and apology from both of them. I never stalked them or threatened them in any way.

Soapboxmom

The temporary injunction hearing exposed Tim Darnell for the liar he is and left him with no injunction and not one ounce of credibility either

Transcript_of_Temporary_Injunction_Hearing[1].pdf


Soapboxmom

Tim Darnell's January 2009 Depo:

Tim Darnell 2009 Depo Part 1.pdf

Tim Darnell 2009 Depo Part 2.pdf

Forwarded Message:
Subj:RE: Jack, Thank you
Date:11/6/2007 3:57:59 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From:jack@advantageconferences.com
To: Sent from the Internet (Details)


Rep X, I did nothing to change anyone's position. What was clear and in writing when you started was a guarantee based on attending the main product, which was and is the MMC. You also received and participated in many mentoring calls and we have those recorded with your introductions as well as you sharing how blessed you were to be part of AC and how much you have grown. What is irresponsible are the acusations and hatred that you and Heather SoapBoxMom from Garland, TX, have leveled against this company. She has come out from the shadows after two+ years and will be accountable for her actions.

I encourage you to focus on what is good and right. Unforgiveness will continue to stand in the way of your blessings. I pray for your hardened heart and for clarity for you, Rep X. I will continue to love and pray for those who persecute us.

In Service,

Jack

Jack M. Weinzierl
Advantage Conferences, LLC
Christian Entrepreneur and Mentor
http://OneOasis.com

Learn more about Marketplace Ministry at: http://JackWeinzierl.com

__________________________________________________ ________________________
Boy did Jack and Tim go down in flames when suing me. Jack being the pansy he is did not show up for any of the proceedings. Tim Darnell said it perfectly in one of his many depositions when he opined that Advantage Conferences had good short term testimonials.

I will never forgive Jack for defrauding hundreds of people. The tragic consequences of involvement in Advantage Conferences hit way too close to home. The only place I can visit my best friend is at the cemetary. I will continue to fight for what is right and do everything in my power to see no one else is harmed. There definitely will be accountability Jack Weinzierl.

Soapboxmom

Amongst your saved documents, do you by chance happen to have any record of an apology from either of the lads ?

Even a tiny "oops" perhaps ?

Perhaps Jackie should consider undertaking some sort of 12 Step program in an effort to deal with his addiction/s

A little bit of Step 8 would be good for the soul:

8) Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends*** to them all.

AMENDS *** English

Etymology

From French amendes, plural of amende. Compare with amende.
Pronunciation

• (US) IPA: /ʌˈmɛnds/

Noun

amends (plural only)

1. Compensation for a loss or injury; recompense; reparation. Amends were made for the damage and no charges were filed.
   
   • As to you, Mr. Carruthers, I think that you have done what you could to make amends for your share in an evil plot. — Doyle
   
   

Usage notes

Usually found as to make amends.
Synonyms

• (compensation) reparation, redress, restitution, indemnity

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Amongst your saved documents, do you by chance happen to have any record of an apology from either of the lads ?

Even a tiny "oops" perhaps ?

Jack blathered something about helping those in his group in one of his long rants on Scam, but as the elderly rep that sued him was never offered a fair settlement, well....

I archived Scam's three biggest AC threads through January 2009, so if it is in there it will go up. Those boys thought they were smart to remove everything. But, what they have published will live forever on the internet here. Isn't that nice?

Soapboxmom

Boca Pol 'Fesses Up to Colbert - Page 1 - News - Broward/Palm Beach - Broward-Palm Beach New Times
Jesus Saves
Like everybody else in this country, Tailpipe wants to get rich. And like everybody else, he wants it to come fast and effortlessly. So the 'Pipe squirmed with anticipation when he found a card from a rep for Advantage Conferences (it was perched on a gas pump in West Palm Beach), promising that he could make "$7,000 Over & Over & Over Again." How could Tailpipe resist!

The almost-clincher for the 'Pipe was the hint of divine protection the program offers. After receiving promotional materials from Mike Melvin, an Advantage Conferences emissary, the 'Pipe learned that it was a "Christ-centered business." This battered auto part wouldn't be dealing with just the hurly-burly of capitalist schemers but with an enterprise bathed in a warm, heavenly glow. All Tailpipe needed to do was ante up $10,059.90.

Based in Allen, Texas, Advantage Conferences recruits "pro reps" across the country to sell its $10,000 product, a ticket to a two-day "Millionaire Mindset Conference." That's a golden ticket. With each one you sell, you get a $7,000 commission.

You don't even have to buy the first ticket yourself, the company's promotional materials say; the only cost to participate and represent the company is a $59.95 "enrollment fee." Of course, you don't get the full $7,000 commission unless you cough up ten grand of your own money. But, hey, it's a breeze. There are already pro reps all over Florida, from Loxahatchee to Tampa to Boca Raton, who are so eager to add you to their ranks that they're leaving business cards in odd public places.

"Nobody knows about this company," says Melvin, Tailpipe's own pro rep, who declined to answer questions about his income, saying that success depends entirely on personal effort and marketing skill. The company has grown from 220 people last November to 500 today, he says.

"As it grows out, it's going to go faster," Melvin says.
You betcha. The promotional materials talk about the "infinite width" and "infinite depth" of its potential to make money, guaranteeing that it is "legal" and "federally trademarked." The visual aid the company uses is a diagram of a pyramid.
Wait a minute. This sounds familiar.

The money really starts to roll in when the folks you recruit start to recruit some candidates of their own. Advantage Conferences is run by Tim Darnell, who writes on the company's website: "You get 100% of 70% of the two training sales of everyone who comes into your business, ad infinitum." Could this be a Jesus Christ-endorsed pyramid scheme?

Darnell apparently learned the ropes of this kind of financing at Liberty League International (formerly called Big Ass Britches Holdings, LLC, according to Arizona corporation records), which sells conferences and a "multimedia personal development program" for huge fees.

Darnell left Liberty League in 2003, got Jesus' backing, and started Advantage Conferences. In May of this year, Arizona's attorney general fined Liberty League $115,000 for "tricking" consumers. Though Liberty League suggests that associates who hawk its products will earn sizable commissions, the attorney general's office found that a "majority of participants did not earn enough to cover the amount they paid to buy the products sold to them."

When the Dallas Better Business Bureau suggested last fall that Advantage Conferences might be a pyramid scheme, Darnell sued them for "defamation and business disparagement." A year later, the suit is still under way. The Florida attorney general's office hasn't received any complaints about Advantage, though if things proceed as such endeavors do, it may be only a matter of time. Consumer affairs experts say that, as would-be investors get wise to what's going on, pyramids inevitably collapse, with the pro reps at the bottom losing their own $10,000 investment.

Become a Christian entrepreneur today — Tim Darnell and Mike Melvin will thank you. The 'Pipe said thanks, JC, but no thanks.
__________________________________________________ ___________
This article was an exhibit in Tim Darnell's deposition when the delusional fool sued me and lost. He should know my lead attorney was going to do only a short deposition to pin him down on the alleged false statements he was claiming that I had made (poor little Timmy couldn't come up with a single one.) At my request and with the support of the incredible 2nd attorney who did most of the work on the case, the senior attorney cheerfully agreed to do a thorough deposition covering as much history and detail with Darnell as possible in the six hours alloted.

This article is incredible. Ol' Tailpipe mentions the soon the be lost suit with the Better Business Bureau. He explains the pyramid scheme pay plan with infinite width and depth and reminds consumers that all these pyramids collapse. Advantage Conferences was well in the red by May 2007. Darnell finally declared chapter 7 bankruptcy tens of thousands of dollars in debt later in December 2009 as he and scammer-in-chief Jack Weinzierl believed that would end the 2 year old lawsuit against them by an elderly rep rightly demanding a refund and damages.

Th rest of the story is the cases against the BBB and me ended in Tim Darnell losing in Summary Judgment. They spent their elderly victim into oblivion and now her case is being fought right here in the court of public opinion. Tim Darnell can't be collected against as he is a pauper living off of his wife (a physical therapist making $70,000.00 a year working overtime to support Tim's golf habit) and facing a $97,265.17 tax lien. Jack Weinzierl is living off of his in-laws and wife's paltry reachers salary.

Poor Mike and Laura Melvin are probably wishing to God they had never gotten tangled up with these fake Christian scammers.

Soapboxmom

About

Husband to Cathy (25 years), father to Lindy (junior at Texas A&M), father to Hannah (freshman at Collin College),
Cathy & Tim Darnell

Father to Caleb (11 year old, 6th grade – acting, football and basketball).

Follower of Jesus Christ…. believer in and proponent in Free Enterprise, Capitalism & Free Markets…politically conservative.

Marketing Guru – “Dominate Your Market,” “Reputation Management Solution,” “Mobile Marketing.” Cutting Edge concepts highly effective for virtually any product, service, organization. Fully integrated marketing reach.

Professionally – licensed Financial Professional and a specialist in retirement, investment, and money transfer strategies that minimize taxes and maximize safety and returns.

Favorite pastime is golf and the goal is to get my handicap into single digits this year.
My cell number is: 469.667.3444 If I don’t pick up immediately, I’ll call you back. Office: 1-888-832-7635.
Blessings,
Tim Darnell
TimDarnellac@gmail.com
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________________________
Why on earth claim he knows anything about online reputation management, taxes and investments I can't imagine. Some Marketing guru I might add. From June 2003 until Jack joined Advantage Conferences in February 2005 he only had 13 reps (most of which were hangers on from the defunct All Star Entrepreneur.)

Why bring the wife's and kids' names into all this. Who wants to have to explain that their father or husband is a tax protester nutbag with a 97 grand tax lien that sued the Dallas BBB and Soapboxmom and lost both in Summary Judgment? Very creepy!

Soapboxmom

http://www.realscam.com/f14/tim-darn...-769/#post9725

The wife and kids have had their names plastered all over the net. His bragging about the home remodels just associates them with his bogus charity. Everyone at church will know he stole their church's name to set that publicity stunt up. Treasures for the Kingdom was just another nail in the Advantage Conferences coffin!

Soapboxmom

Originally Posted by Soapboxmom

Tim Darnell's January 2009 Depo:

Tim Darnell 2009 Depo Part 1.pdf

Tim Darnell 2009 Depo Part 2.pdf

The funniest testimony is off of the record. At the end of the deposition Tim Darnell plopped down 35 lbs / 5000 pages of Scam posts from me and hundreds of other posters. He is such a complete fool he thought that woud all go in the record and be considered by the judge. My attorneys insisted he provide factual statements made by me that he could prove were false. Well, almost 3 years later we are still waiting. Darnell is such a delusional fool that for months afterward he kept wheeling around those pages like a complete and utter fool. Even though he lost in Summary Judgment because his petition was a lie-filled psychotic rant and was completely groundless, he is still having fantasies of relitigating my truthful, scathing posts.

The rest of the Scam posts that he removed will go back up as quickly as possible. He got no injunction in my case and the Collin County judge specifically said I didn't have to remove anything, but Weinzierl and Darnell being the dishonest dirtbags they are threatened or bribed George Dranichak to remove my truthful posts against the wishes of the judges to boot! Darnell said under oath that he had been paying his legal bills then totalling $18,000.00, but he wrote off $20,000.00 of personally generated fees owed to Jason Charles Ciarochi on Advantage Conferences bankruptcy. My attorney asked in jest if Darnell was paying Jason by the pound after picking up that 5000 page pile of Scam posts Darnell totes around. Jason didn't get pounds, dollars or even Monopoly money from Stiff 'Em Darnell!

Someone please tell that buffoon it has been litigated and it is over!

2009-03-17-Order Granting Dobrott Summary Judgment.pdf

2008-02-24-Dobrott's Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf

2009-04-08-Dobrott Motion for Sanctions.pdf

Soapboxmom

SoapBoxDad 07-06-2006 09:36 PM Re: Advantages Conferences / Tim Darnell

Yes, SoapBoxMom and Wishyouknew, you should be very careful about that which you write, especially when it is knowingly false. Keep up with the evidence. You will not be able to hide behind, well I thought that was the truth, well I was just sharing my opinion acting as if I had a competency in this industry, blah, blah, blah.

As for me, I have great peace as everything that I have written can be backed up and is truthful. Unlike those on this thread where they feel the end justifies their means, they will be accountable in more than one way. Good luck to you with that.

AS for credibility, I have my MBA, have built mutliple million dollar businesses and we have attracted fellow millionaires, pastors, doctors, entrepreneurs, and people from various professions and stay at home Moms and Dads.

I am proud of the folks that we attract into our business and I pray every day that the right people are attracted to AC and that the wrong people--you know who you are, stay away from Advantage Conferences. Life is too short to work with folks like you, WishYouKnew, Renloyx and Phinnly.

Business is great and enjoying time with the family while it builds. Praise the Lord and there is no other business I would rather be building right now. Reading through this thread over the past week, I did not see one post even worth the time to respond to.

It is a shame you folks cannot get paid by your inaccuracies or the size of your lies. Maybe you should try the Star or Enquirer.

I do continue to pray for you.

Your douchebaggery has caught up with you scammer. That case was filed by Tim Darnell obviously at your behest. That lie-filled rant of a petition was filled with talk of the many threats I had made. You sick bastards were never able to provide even a single false statment made by me. You lost in Summary Judgment as the case was nothing more than a frivolous, groundless harassment suit.

Well, scammer Jack, there were around $60,000.00 in attorney fees and since Tim Darnell was a confirmed pauper my attorneys recommended I not put more good money after bad I intend to take the 60 grand right out of your scamming hind end! We can have it out right here assuming you have the guts and manhood to respond, Weinzierl!

We know you can't back anything up you lying sack of manure. When the elderly rep sued you, you refused to turn over any discovery even though you had a protective order in place. Until one week before trial all you had produced was your 1099's. Well, who needed those??? You had been bragging of your earnings all the way along. At trial you got so flustered when I questioned you that you admitted you had withheld everything. You said you hadn't produced because I was posting. You had to hide everything! You are not transparent! You are not Christian! You are nothing but a low-life scammer and all the facts prove that conclusively!

Soapboxmom

Scam Thread - Advantage Conferences / Tim Darnell (Financial Planner from Allen, TX) / Jack Weinzierl

Jack just keeps on threatening and trying to frighten his critics into silence.

Soapboxmom