Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree7Likes
  • 2 Post By Bran P
  • 1 Post By Soapboxmom
  • 3 Post By wserra
  • 1 Post By Soapboxmom

Thread: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

  1. #1
    JustTooMuchTime is offline Senior Scambuster
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,456
    Blog Entries
    128

    Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    "Byron Nelson" - aka byronnelson796 made this bizarre statement about Stephen's posting of his default judgement against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing:
    "You are an idiot. Stephen has the right and an obligation to clear his name just the same as anyone else."

    Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle ...

  2. #2
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,945
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    I for one want to see the proof of service. It is also quite possible, had the defendant been properly served and answered, that this case would have been tossed for lack of jurisdiction. The defendant was said to be in Florida, so why is that clown suing her in Collin County Texas????

  3. #3
    Whip's Avatar
    Whip is offline Anonymous. As are you all
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    5,807

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    Quote Originally Posted by Soapboxmom View Post
    I for one want to see the proof of service. It is also quite possible, had the defendant been properly served and answered, that this case would have been tossed for lack of jurisdiction. The defendant was said to be in Florida, so why is that clown suing her in Collin County Texas????
    To precisely get a default judgment, albeit a bogus one.

  4. #4
    Bran P is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    I agree. Everyone has the right to clear their name. Problem is that this DEFAULT JUDGEMENT didn't clear Stephen Pierce (What Is Success Sculpting) name or clear up anything else. Does you (byronnelson796) not know the meaning of DEFAULT? There was no testimony, no trial, no evidence presented, no depositions, no witnesses, no accountants reports (because Stephen Pierce won't spend the money to hire them). There was NOTHING done to clear his name or point blame to anyone else. Nada. Nothing. Just an overwrought divorcee who didn't get her paperwork in on time. Big deal, Byron.

    Remember when you played soccer and the other team failed to show up for the game cause several of their players were sick or it was pouring down rain? You won by default and took off for the Pizza Hut. But did you crow to all your fiends that you "WON" that game? Of course not. You got too much sense to do that, Byron. YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IS REAL AND WHAT AIN'T. Stephen Pierce don't have that much sense. He bragging over nuthin' and you're buying' it. Shame on you, son. Shame on you.

  5. #5
    littleroundman is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    16,855

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    $3.5 million settlement in a default judgement against your ex wife, hey ???

    Maybe it's an American thing, but I sure as h*** wouldn't be crowing about it in public.

    Then again, I'm not a guru, I suppose.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing

  6. #6
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,945
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    Case History
    Case Number 296-00485-2012
    Date Filed: 02/07/2012
    Case Type: CV - All Other Civil Cases
    Status: Re-Opened
    Style: Stephen Pierce International, Inc,Impulsive Profits, Inc Vs. Alicia Lyttle,Loretta Lyttle,Ilona Lyttle,Monetized Marketing ,LLC
    JudicialOfficer: Roach, John R., Jr. in 296th District Court
    Parties
    Type Name DOB Address Attorney
    Defendant Lyttle, Alicia Shawn M McCaskill
    Defendant Lyttle, Ilona Pro Se
    Defendant Lyttle, Loretta Pro Se
    Defendant Monetized Marketing ,LLC Shawn M McCaskill
    Plaintiff Impulsive Profits, Inc Paul B Kerlin
    Plaintiff Stephen Pierce International, Inc Paul B Kerlin

    Case Events
    Date Event Type Comments Cancelled Reason Time Judge
    02/07/2012 Plaintiff's Original Petition (OCA) $258.00
    02/07/2012 Request for Citation $8.00
    02/07/2012 Jury Fee Paid $30.00
    02/07/2012 Request for Citation to Secretary Of State $12.00
    02/08/2012 Citation thru Sec. of State
    02/08/2012 Citation
    03/09/2012 Correspondence Copies of Affidavit of Service
    03/12/2012 Original Answer
    03/13/2012 Letter with Sheriff returns
    04/02/2012 Motion for Substituted Service Plaintiff's Motion for Service on Alicia Lyttle Under Rule 106
    04/03/2012 Affidavit of service from Secretary of State. Forwarded on 02.10.12 by cert mail and returned on 3.15.12 "Unclaimed"
    04/03/2012 Letter with sheriff returns
    04/04/2012 Correspondence from court
    04/05/2012 Order Granted on motion for service under Rule 106
    04/23/2012 Original Answer in Response to the State of Texas Civil Citation
    06/27/2012 Motion for Default Judgment
    06/27/2012 Affidavit of Paul B Kerlin
    07/09/2012 Correspondence from Theodore Watts
    07/13/2012 Default Judgment
    07/18/2012 Mailed default judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing LLC
    07/20/2012 Letter with Amended DFJ
    07/22/2012 Amended Judgment
    07/23/2012 Mailed def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing
    07/27/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable
    08/01/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable to Monetized Marketing LLC
    08/03/2012 Request for Copies $1.00 / pg
    08/06/2012 Original Answer
    08/06/2012 Original Answer Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer
    08/13/2012 Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00 Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
    08/17/2012 Correspondence
    09/21/2012 Plaintiff's Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
    09/26/2012 Hearing Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial 9:00 AM
    09/26/2012 General Docket Entry Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC. Roach, John R., Jr.
    09/26/2012 Order
    01/28/2013 Notice of Nonsuit
    02/05/2013 Order on Nonsuit
    02/20/2013 Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial

    So, we have an order to vacate Pierce's judgment and for a new trial. The case has been reopened. They have a rather odd fellow for the judge. This is the judge I was before who made some very bizarre rulings in the case of Rep X vs. Advantage Conferences.

    This will be one to follow. I might even drop by and catch a hearing!

    Soapboxmom

  7. #7
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,945
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    We shall see how long this second comment remains. Apparently, Pierce doesn't want his readers to have the facts:

    Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle ...

    + Follow
    Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing

    by Stephen Pierce on Aug 02, 2012



    • 16,929 views

    Stephen Pierce Awarded $3.6 Million Judgment Against Alicia Lyttle & Monetized Marketing. You can read this order for more details.





    1–9 of 9 comments Post a comment
    Heather Dobrott 02/20/2013 Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial

    Are you such a lying piece of dirt you don't want your readers to have the facts?

  8. #8
    wserra is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    143

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    Quote Originally Posted by Soapboxmom View Post
    Are you such a lying piece of dirt you don't want your readers to have the facts?
    Famous question from the Nuremberg trials, directed over and over by the chief Russian prosecutor to Hermann Göring on cross-examination: "Do you now admit that you are a Fascist beast?"
    "A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
    - David Hume

  9. #9
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,945
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    That silly little man keeps removing my comments. I am right back on his butt!

    Post a comment Heather Dobrott Where is Paul Harvey with the rest of the story when we need him???

    07/22/2012 Amended Judgment
    07/23/2012 Mailed def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing
    07/27/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable
    08/01/2012 Returned Mail Undeliverable to Monetized Marketing LLC
    08/03/2012 Request for Copies $1.00 / pg
    08/06/2012 Original Answer
    08/06/2012 Original Answer Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer
    08/13/2012 Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00 Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
    08/17/2012 Correspondence
    09/21/2012 Plaintiff's Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
    09/26/2012 Hearing Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial 9:00 AM
    09/26/2012 General Docket Entry Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC. Roach, John R., Jr.
    09/26/2012 Order
    01/28/2013 Notice of Nonsuit
    02/05/2013 Order on Nonsuit
    02/20/2013 Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial

  10. #10
    formeremployee is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1

    Re: Stephen Pierce "Follower" Claims "Name Cleared" Because Of Default Judgement!

    Dear Soapbox and Whip, I am pleased as punch to inform you that the Secretary of State Office of the Comptroller has officially put Stephen Pierce International (SPI) out of business for unpaid taxes. See this link: https://ourcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/s...ID=32033222616.

    That means that SPI is no longer able to sue anyone. The court has closed all pending cases that have come before it and will close the case against Alicia and Lorette as well. See this link: Search.

    Those who have been damaged can sue Stephen Pierce individually for their damages as he does have income from new online businesses and book sales. I think it costs $125 to sue him in Small Claims Court and you can get a judgement up to $10,000.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed on this website are solely those of their respective authors.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42