Once again your post is filled with red herring arguments and avoidance of the question.
First off the universe is defined for all of us since it is a wrod in the english vocabulary. There are other words for what your point (multiverse, branes, bubbles etc.) The definition of universe is very clear and your efforts to cloud it is a logical fallacy of argument on your part.
There might be more questions, and in fact most likely be. But that is another logiacl fallacy on your part to try and avoid the question before us. This type of argument is like you refusing to answer my question "What is your name" with a response "If I answer you might ask me where I live so I won't answer".
What is fairy tale about logical choices? This is an association type of logical fallacy. Avoidence of the question and then claiming it is 'fairy tale'.
Listing the possibilites does explain or answer anything. It is just LISTING THE POSSIBILITIES.
Then you finish with a non sequiter. I'm going to borrow a line from the movie Braveheart "Just answer the freanin question".
It is not hard. I and many physicists say there are just two logical options for the universe. You claim this is wrong. So therefore, provide the additional options. No matter what mechanism the universe used for comming into existence it MUST and can ONLY be due to two options. It was designed/created or it happened through luck/chance. There are NO option options possible. If I'm wrong then tell us what other logical option is there?