Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 60 of 60
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

  1. #51
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    Heather Dawne Dobrott http:://www.realscam.com/.../ntpsa-north-texas-premier-soccer...

    NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall
    realscam.com

    Like · Reply · Remove Preview · December 29, 2016 at 8:49pm


    David Gray Go to savethentpsa.org to save men's soccer in Dallas.
    Unlike · Reply · 1 · January 3 at 10:26am


    Steven Graham Very interesting information about these fields which a have always been questionable.

    Unlike · Reply · 1 · 4 mins
    Can't wait to see the future court filings and docs!

  2. #52
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    Why would a 501 c 3 charity demand that financial and corporate records be kept secret?

    Ntpsa, larry hall and robert malphurs motion for protective order

    http://www.slideshare.net/HeatherDob...ion-to-protect

  3. #53
    laidback's Avatar
    laidback is offline Senior Troll
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,787

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Soapboxmom View Post
    Why would a 501 c 3 charity demand that financial and corporate records be kept secret?

    Ntpsa, larry hall and robert malphurs motion for protective order

    http://www.slideshare.net/HeatherDob...ion-to-protect
    I don't think IRS rules allow that. Public Charities =public records. Has anyone approached the IRS about that mess?
    It seems like in this "industry" common sense is not all that common!

  4. #54
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    The Plaintiff has filed reports with the Texas Attorney General's Office and the IRS from what I understand. The parent organization, North Texas State Soccer, on which defendant Larry Hall from this lawsuit and David Arciniega from my lawsuit sit are having their Semi-AGM right now. I sent out the following e-mail about that meeting just this morning:

    From: Heather Dobrott]
    Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 9:25 AM
    To:
    Subject: North Texas Semi-AGM

    North Texas Semi-AGM
    Dear North Texas Members,
    The rule change proposals include a proposed rule that would shrink the board so that it could become more of a policy making body and allow the paid office staff to respond in real time and address concerns. I strongly support this. The North Texas Board members do not step in and help with financial issues and by-law concerns. The North Texas board completely flouts its own by-laws. In fact, two of the current board members are embroiled in very controversial litigation because of their mismanagement of their own local associations.

    I believe that independent counsel to provide oversight and see that there is accountability is vital with the current issues going on. North Texas State Soccer requires all local associations to have an Ethics Committee in place. Their own errant director, David Arciniega (Chairman of Coaching Education and President of Garland Soccer) has refused to allow one to be formed for the entire decade he has been running GSA. The numbers speak to how well run it is as he came in to an association with 4500 players and a wonderful atmosphere and now there are less than 2000 players. The association is imploding and there is conflict and infighting. David Arciniega refuses to produce the required A & D decision letters which puts Garland Soccer NOT in good standing and his buddies at NTSSA take no action. I had to file a lawsuit to try and get the required decision letter that would allow me to appeal to NTSSA. NTSSA had been informed numerous times about that and other flagrant by-law violations by Mr. Arciniega. Does NTSSA have its own Ethics Committee?

    "11.1.1
    All Member Associations are directed to form their own ethics committee and to hold hearings--WITH THE PARTIES HAVING THE RIGHT TO BE PRESENT--on alleged violations of the Code of Ethics when properly submitted.

    Page 60 GSA Bylaws and League rules"

    Daivd Arciniega did not promote coaching education in his own association (Garland Soccer) at all. In the summer of 2012 I had to go to Plano to take the F Clinic as coaches were leaving in droves and my son's team would have folded without me stepping up to coach. I had never player soccer and was really panicked. The wonderful folks in PYSA helped me. They encouraged me to start with the F Clinic as I had no time before the season started and I had a U12 team to lead. I joined the Garland Board in December 2012 and I had to fight hard just to get a G Clinic offered as Garland had not been educating coaches for a long time. The Chairman of Coaching Education position should be eliminated.

    NTSSA clearly is in crisis and cannot police itself. The members must demand drastic and meaningful changes!




    From: Heather
    Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:29 PM
    To: 'dcrawford@ntxsoccer.org'; 'david@ntxsoccer.org'; 'chris@ntxsoccer.org'
    Cc: 'jsutter@usyouthsoccer.org'
    Subject: Garland Soccer Association Financial Accountability

    Dear North Texas board members and office staff,

    I am respectfully requesting that North Texas exercise jurisdiction over the Garland Soccer Association and conduct a thorough investigation into the missing funds. It is also imperative that the phony charges filed against me and the U12 director and the no-confidence vote (brought against me for seeking proper documentation related to the missing funds and taking the appropriate action by reporting these missing funds to the proper authorities) be evaluated in relation to their validity and adherence to proper protocol and procedure as prescribed in our by-laws.

    2.2.6 Jurisdiction
    This Association shall have jurisdiction over all Member Associations’ administrators, referees,
    coaches, assistant coaches, managers registered players and teams affiliated with it. Each Member
    Association shall retain its own autonomy, but will adhere to its Bylaws and Rules and Regulations
    and will comply with the authority of the Association. If the Association is presented sufficient
    evidence that a Member Association is not adhering to its Bylaws and Rules and Regulations, the
    Association may form a committee to investigate the allegations and make recommendations to the
    Executive Committee to correct the infraction(s). If gross misuse of funds, misapplication of
    Bylaws, or misapplication of rules and regulations is discovered, the Member Association shall be
    declared not in good standing and given sixty (60) days to correct the situation, or the Association
    may take more immediate action if deemed necessary by the Executive Committee.

    Please see the accompanying documents attached. Note the executive committee completely and unnecessarily bypassed the board. They agreed to a discount on future withholdings by Jevin to repay over $8,000.00 of missing payments from the spring 2013 soccer season. Jevin, already had a history of late payments and issues. The payment processor Corduro was the convenient scapegoat for this missing money without a shred of documentation to substantiate that they were in any way responsible. The story that Jevin couldn’t get a loan to pay GSA the money owed is beyond laughable. That suggests that Jevin has serious financial concerns as they cannot qualify for a small business loan among many other possibilities.

    Another director pointed out the obvious at our monthly meeting in July 2013. This whole financial issue is fraud plain and simple. The first step (which I in fact took) should have been to go to authorities as it cost nothing and was personally recommended to me by my licensed attorney and a forensic fraud investigator. When I took that proper step of going to our local police, I was attacked by the board and David Arciniega told the police and the board that any talk of these missing payments was “unfounded.” What we have been writing and saying about Corduro, for months without any verifiable documentation amounts to libel and slander. And, reduced fees do not address the critical issue of who was responsible for the late and missing payments to begin with and why anyone might wish to cover up that problem.
    The second page of the attachment shows Jevin’s glowing testimonial about Corduro. They claim they are getting funds the next day from Corduro. Next, I have included my August board report. I documented in writing the information we had been given by David Arciniega. In July when I asked for more information about the missing payments from Jevin, David Arciniega went on about $50,000.00 in losses he claimed Jevin suffered due to Corduro. I was horrified to think other non-profits and businesses might have been harmed and continue to face losses due to Corduro and that GSA was taking no action. I questioned why Jevin didn’t go to the authorities and why they were filing a court case in lieu of a free investigation by the police. I also questioned how Jevin could fund a court case if they couldn’t pay GSA the 8 grand owed or even qualify for a loan. I am very concerned that we are continuing to do business with Jevin when we have no verifiable documentation about any of this.

    The November General Coaches Meeting minutes follow. Following is the quote of what David Arciniega said at the September meeting:
    “GSA receives it largest income from the registration fees so all income must match the data in the Jevin System daily. Jevin/online provider owed GSA $8,061 (in June 2013) which was paid in full to GSA as of August 20th. To compensate GSA for this delay, Jevin will lower its rates resulting in additional revenue for GSA. Litigation is on-going between the online provider and Jevin so additional information may not be divulged per the North Texas lawyers.”
    Why is this misinformation being sent out to our coaches? Board members have asked for proper documentation for months and none has been forthcoming. The president and executive committee members must be aware at this juncture that the court case is pure fiction. I need the contact information for the North Texas lawyers to be forwarded to me immediately, so that any records they have related to this financial fraud can be accessed by the GSA board members seeking clarification on this matter. The GSA board must make decisions based on verifiable fact and not rumor, innuendo and hearsay.

    I checked with Collin County (where Jevin is located), Dallas County and Tarrant County (where Corduro is based) and confirmed there was never any action filed. Knowing that, I went to Corduro to get their side of the story as should have been done by the leadership of GSA in the beginning. The CEO and president of Corduro, Robert Ziegler, generously offered to speak with me and respond to my request for information in writing. Said correspondence is attached. Mr. Ziegler indicated that Jevin and Corduro had parted ways amicably a year ago. He stated that Corduro does not owe Jevin any money, much less the $50,000.00 claimed by David Arciniega. Jevin never threatened or filed any litigation against them. And, no investigations by law enforcement were conducted to his knowledge. So, GSA, David Arciniega and NTSSA by association have been libeling and slandering Corduro and frankly we are fortunate that Mr. Ziegler is not pursuing any litigation against us at this time in light of the wild tales that have been told regarding his company.

    The actions of the GSA president and executive committee defy logic. We are a charitable organization and everything we do should be well documented and completely transparent. We are to be the good stewards of the funds of the families of Garland that come to us. I have been asking for open meetings and proper documentation, all of which constitutes normal procedure and ordinary care for a board member that is executing their legal obligations and duties. Our president is still advising people they are not welcome at board meetings and operating this public charity under a veil of secrecy.
    To allow continual harassment and retaliation against board members that are making ordinary and necessary request for proper documentation related to financial and other matters is reprehensible and must be addressed. The phony charges and No Confidence vote filed against me are nothing but a dirty tactic employed by our president and vice president to scare off board members who ask questions and demand that business be conducted openly and above board.

    I have no intention of tolerating any more nonsense and will get my attorney and the media involved if I am subjected to any further abuse and retaliatory measures. That is precisely why I have come to North Texas for help. The GSA board is no longer able to fulfill its mission with the secrecy, lies, and misinformation being spread. This board and office cannot function when members and employees fear reprisal and retaliation by the leadership when they are simply trying in good faith to carry out their jobs. We have a board where members are afraid to stand up and do the right things as the leadership has made it clear what will happen to those who ask too many questions or don’t follow the wishes of the president.

    Again, I respectfully request a full investigation into the financial dealings within GSA and the obvious attempts at bullying and harassing board members who are working hard to serve our member families. We board members come from various professions and backgrounds and a scandal involving financial fraud would seriously harm our personal reputations and even our livelihoods in some cases. This issue effects the good standing of GSA and North Texas and needs to be addressed immediately. I look forward to your response by the 23rd please.

    Thanks,

    Heather Dobrott
    U6 Girls Director for the Garland Soccer Association


    <GSA-Jevin-Financial.pdf>

  5. #55
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    https://www.501c3.org/who-really-owns-a-nonprofit/
    Who Really Owns a Nonprofit?

    September 1, 2015
    Greg McRay, EA
    Education, Featured, Managing a Nonprofit, Starting a nonprofit

    The concept of who owns a nonprofit organization can be hard for some to grasp, especially given that the answer is, “No one…and everyone!” We encounter this confusion with new clients on a fairly regular basis. And, given people’s understanding of how basic business operates, it is understandable. In order to fully appreciate the concept of “non-ownership”, it is helpful to first talk about the various types of business entities. Then, we’ll look at organizational purpose. By the end of the article, it should make a lot more sense.

    There are several different types of business entities. For-profit companies make up most of them. Here are a few (there are others)…all of these have an owner or owners:

    Sole Proprietorship: ...
    General Partnership: ...
    Corporation (for-profit):...
    S-Corporation: ...
    Limited Liability Company: An LLC is a formal association which combines the advantage of a corporation’s limited liability and the flexibility and single taxation of a general partnership. An LLC has members rather than shareholders.

    With the exception of the LLC, the business entities listed above cannot be used for nonprofit organizations. Even the use of an LLC is extremely rare; all nonprofit LLC members must be recognized 501(c)(3) organizations, not people or other entity types. The most popular business entity for nonprofits is the nonprofit corporation. This type of corporation is different from a typical for-profit corporation or S-Corporation. Those have shareholders (owners). A nonprofit corporation has no owners whatsoever, only stakeholders. A stakeholder is not an owner, but rather someone who has a stake in the successful operation of the organization. Stakeholders could be members of the nonprofit, or even beneficiaries of the nonprofit’s activities. One thing stakeholders have in common: they have no legal ability to profit personally…hence, nonprofit. A nonprofit corporation is formed to carry out a public purpose, whether that be religious, educational, charitable, scientific or whatever. It is prohibited from acting in a manner that results in private inurement (profit) to individuals (for more information about inurement, please refer to our post about “Avoiding Conflicts of Interest).

    How can that be? Someone has to own it, right? No, not really. The nonprofit organization is not “owned” by the person or persons that started it. It is a public organization that belongs to the public at-large. The parties responsible to operate the organization for the stakeholders are the members of the board of directors.

    Also, a nonprofit corporation cannot be sold. It is simply not possible. If a nonprofit corporation were to “close down”, or dissolve, the board of directors of the nonprofit must distribute all of the nonprofit’s assets to another nonprofit corporation after all debts have been settled.

    “No one…and everyone!” Hopefully now, it is much clearer what we mean.
    Now if we could just get Larry Hall and David Arciniega clear on this!


  6. #56
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    North Texas State Soccer Association Inc - GuideStar Profile

    North Texas Premier Soccer, Garland Soccer and North Texas State Soccer Association all declined to respond to Guidestar.

    From Guidestar:
    Governance

    BOARD LEADERSHIP PRACTICES

    GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section, which enables organizations and donors to transparently share information about essential board leadership practices. Self-reported by organization
    NTSSA and its affiliates seem to think that they are untouchable and can flout their own by-laws and state laws concerning fiduciary duties. Garland Soccer is nothing more than a dictatorship run by tyrant David Arciniega I know from personal experience.

    BOARD ORIENTATION & EDUCATION

    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations?
    Garland Soccer offers no training or orientation of any kind to its board members. They are totally in the dark about their fiduciary duties according to state law and have been brainwashed to believe their job is to do what president David Arciniega dictates. The charity is run in a shroud of secrecy. Board members can't get financial and other documentation and are forced to make decisions on hearsay. The members and public are not welcome at board meetings.

    CEO OVERSIGHT

    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year?
    The office staff is controlled completely by Arciniega. The staff is not allowed in the board meetings and is not able to give the board information and feedback needed to run the organization according to state law. The board is little more than a puppet of the president and he keeps the board and staff in the dark.
    ETHICS & TRANSPARENCY

    Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year?
    Garland Soccer does sign these, but the conflict of interest policy is simply window dressing and is clearly not honored by David Arciniega.

    BOARD COMPOSITION

    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership?
    The board is comprised mostly of cronies under David Arciniega's control. Open discussion and questions result in folks being shot down, harassed and attacked. Arciniega routinely refuses to allow the board to see financial and other records and forces them to make decisions based on little more than gossip and his wishes.

    BOARD PERFORMANCE

    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years?
    Anyone who notes that the board is not fulfilling its fiduciary duties according to state law is harassed and attacked. One dare not point out that fellow board members have only a 38% attendance rate or are not fulfilling their job responsibilities. The harassment and intimidation is unending in Garland Soccer and North Texas State Soccer (NTSSA) has been made aware numerous times and happily sweeps everything under the rug. It is high time the public and members that should be served by this charity and its affiliates demand openness and transparency!

  7. #57
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    In addition to dozens and dozens of federal and state tax liens and judgments and censure by the State Board of Accountancy, Robert Malphurs personal life is in total disarray:

    Dallas Fire says woman admitted torching home 'because she was upset at her husband' | Crime | Dallas News
    On Saturday morning it still wasn't clear what sparked the two-alarm blaze that gutted a North Dallas house the night before.

    Three days later, authorities say the woman who lived in the house has admitted to burning it down -- "because she was upset at her husband," according to Dallas Fire-Rescue spokesman Jason Evans. Says Evans in a prepared release, she "admittedly set magazines on fire in a back bedroom." Nancy Malphurs, 46, now sits in the Dallas County jail charged with first-degree arson. She's also being held on a family violence charge.

    Around 10:30 Friday night firefighters were dispatched to the 7700 block of Midbury Drive, not far from Northaven Road and N. Central Expressway.

    By the time firefighters arrived, Evans says, the blaze had already consumed the house: Flames were coming out of the back of the house, the attic, the roof.

    "Subsequently, everyone was pulled out," Evans says, "and a second alarm was transmitted as operations shifted into defensive mode."

    It took about 90 minutes to extinguish the fire; the house was a total loss.

    Initially, firefighters thought the family -- Malphurs and her husband and their two children -- wasn't home. But come daylight Saturday, one thing had become clear: The fire started in the back bedroom.

    Investigators spent the next few days trying to determine why. Evans says Malphurs was arrested by Dallas Fire-Rescue investigators on Monday. According to Dallas County criminal records, Malphurs faces two other charges stemming from that night: a DWI and the family-violence incident. Both are misdemeanor offenses, according to county records, which provide no further details.
    LN ARC RS DOB CASE/BOND CT CHARGE DISP 01 WF 011569 F-1576118 FX ARSON HAB/WORS NAOG 02 WF 011569 MA1558996 MK ASSAULT FV DISM 03 WF 011569 MB1558942 MK DWI PGBC
    Dallas County Felony and Misdemeanor Courts Case Information




    NAME ENTERED MALPHURS NANCY NAME TYPE DF

    Year
    Owner Legal Description
    2016 SIERRA SEED INC
    9802 SAVANNAH AVE
    LUBBOCK, TEXAS 794247306
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT201600042502 DD02042016 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 2/18/2016
    2015 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    9802 SAVANNAH
    LUBBOCK, TEXAS 794247306
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2014 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    9802 SAVANNAH
    LUBBOCK, TEXAS 794247306
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2013 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    9802 SAVANNAH
    LUBBOCK, TEXAS 794247306
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2012 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    9802 SAVANNAH
    LUBBOCK, TEXAS 794247306
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2011 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2010 WHITTENBURG DONALD N
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEIGHTS NO 1
    2: BLK 1/7278 LT 4
    3:
    4: INT 201000004245 DD12302009 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1DA7278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/7/2010
    2009 SIERRA SEED INC
    STE 135
    11520 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 135
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752436607
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: INT200600266892 DD07202006 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 7/21/2006
    2008 SIERRA SEED INC
    STE 135
    11520 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 135
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752436607
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: INT200600266892 DD07202006 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 7/21/2006
    2007 SIERRA SEED INC
    STE 135
    11520 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 135
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752436607
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: INT200600266892 DD07202006 CO-DC
    5: 7278 001 00400 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 7/21/2006
    2006 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 10/8/1998
    2005 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 10/8/1998
    2004 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 10/8/1998
    2003 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 10/8/1998
    2002 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    UNASSIGNED
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/1/1900
    2001 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    UNASSIGNED
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/1/1900
    2000 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    UNASSIGNED
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/1/1900
    1999 MALPHURS ROBERT A
    7706 MIDBURY DR
    DALLAS, TEXAS 752303212
    UNASSIGNED
    1: HILL HAVEN HEITHS
    2: LOT 4 MIDBURY DRIVE
    3:
    4: VOL98197/7435 CO-DALLAS
    5: 7278 001 004 1007278 001
    Deed Transfer Date: 1/1/1900

    Why is North Texas State Soccer allowing such troubled individuals to serve on soccer boards. Why risk the embarrassment? And what about the increased risk of embezzlement with individuals who obviously cannot handle money responsibly and may in fact be desperate for funds due to their personal issues.

  8. #58
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    Tremendous news! The Plaintiff triumphed in court and the Defendants Summary Judgment Motion was stricken!!! All of the issues in the lawsuit will be heard on April 4th.

    CAUSE NO. DC-15-05418
    DAVID and MARLITT GRAY,
    Plaintiffs,
    v.
    NORTH TEXAS PREMIER SOCCER
    ASSOCIATION, INC., and PREMIER
    PARK, INC.
    Defendants.

    §
    §
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT
    14th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
    ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
    On February 23, 2017, came to be heard Plaintiffs, Marlitt and David Grays’,
    Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (hereafter “Motion to
    Strike”). The Court, after considering the papers on file, the evidence on file, and the
    arguments of counsel for the parties, is of the opinion that the Motion to Strike is well
    taken and should, in all things, be GRANTED.
    IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for
    Summary Judgment be stricken from the record, and that the case be tried on Plaintiffs’
    live pleadings.
    Signed this the _____ day of February 2017.
    __________________________________
    JUDGE PRESIDING

  9. #59
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    I received a very disturbing report that an NTSSA board member threatened someone with suit for sharing a post about this lawsuit against NTPSA on social media. North Texas is totally corrupt and this harassment and secrecy must be addressed!

    A source has also indicated that another suit related to safety issues at Premier Park may be filed. Accountability for NTSSA and its affiliates is imperative! I will do everything possible to support these litigants. NTSSA is in crisis!

    https://www.ussoccer.com/integrity-hotline

  10. #60
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    7,931
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: NTPSA North Texas Premier Soccer Association Lawsuit / Larry Hall / Robert Malphurs / Premier Park Soccer Fields

    The Plaintiff in the court case:
    David Gray1 starBeware, Robert Malphurs is a crook. He and others have defrauded a Dallas area nonprofit sports club, of which he has been treasurer for decades, out of more than a million dollars. Just google "NTPSA fraud". He should be in jail for fraud and conspiracy, and may be soon. He is already scope limited by the Accountancy Board.

    Like · Comment · about a week ago ·
    Why is North Texas not handling appeals, grievances, complaints and requests for help and investigating and holding hearings on all these issues???

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed on this website are solely those of their respective authors.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42