Thread: Uncle Festa

Originally Posted by Soapboxmom

Sorry, that won't cut it in court or the court of public opinion. If you make the claims, then you must be prepared to back them up. I don't make statements of fact that I can't fully substantiate, Uncle Fecal.

Yeah,except this sort of stuff:

I have the complete rep list of the first years of Advantage Conferences that I paid for at the courthouse.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

I already said I do not have to provide proof of anything.

Of course you don't HAVE to prove anything.

In fact, it's better for us if you don't.

Reasonable people will quickly work out how to ignore your allegations, unlike the cash gifters, ponzi pimps and other get-rich-quickers whose activities you condone, who are doubtlessly cheering every (imaginary) point you "score"

MoneyMakingBrain, Luterian, HappyCustomer - Uncle Festa, all of them hung on their own petard

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Yeah,except this sort of stuff:

Prove she can't substantiate it, Eddie

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Prove she can't substantiate it, Eddie

She can but she won't because she says she is protecting the innocent. Protecting the innocent ? From she who posts pictures of children playing football ? She who has a mouth like a squaddie (sorry squaddies)BAH!

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Of course you don't HAVE to prove anything.

In fact, it's better for us if you don't.

Reasonable people will quickly work out how to ignore your allegations, unlike the cash gifters, ponzi pimps and other get-rich-quickers whose activities you condone, who are doubtlessly cheering every (imaginary) point you "score"

MoneyMakingBrain, Luterian, HappyCustomer - Uncle Festa, all of them hung on their own petard

Have you forgotten Michael Brown pimped by Fatso's friend Schegel and Real Scams favourite ignore-a-scam. n.b. I have yet to see a Real Scammer including Nobrott and yourself voice any concerns over the innocents ripped off by our Brownie.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Of course you don't HAVE to prove anything.

In fact, it's better for us if you don't.

Reasonable people will quickly work out how to ignore your allegations, unlike the cash gifters, ponzi pimps and other get-rich-quickers whose activities you condone, who are doubtlessly cheering every (imaginary) point you "score"

MoneyMakingBrain, Luterian, HappyCustomer - Uncle Festa, all of them hung on their own petard

When are you going to get it into your head that almost all who sign up to these things strive to be at the top of the pile, no matter who they step on to get there ? Very few, if any, are true innocents, they all aspire to be top dog and be big earners otherwise they wouldn't sign up in the first place. They all pimp their particular scam to one degree or another and so deserve to lose their money.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

I already said I do not have to provide proof of anything.

You don't think you have to provide proof of anything but everyone else has to??....What a hypocrite you are.....

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Have you forgotten Michael Brown pimped by Fatso's friend Schegel and Real Scams favourite ignore-a-scam. n.b. I have yet to see a Real Scammer including Nobrott and yourself voice any concerns over the innocents ripped off by our Brownie.

Who is Michael Brown again? Please jog my memory; it's too common of a name to place precisely.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

When are you going to get it into your head that almost all who sign up to these things strive to be at the top of the pile, no matter who they step on to get there ?

When ????

Probably after you show me some proof your claims are anything but your personal opinion.

I've never seen any evidence "almost all" fraud victims are anything but victims, are "striving to be at the top" of any pile, that "these things" are somehow all the same, or, indeed, how many constitute the "very few" you consider to be somehow complicit in being defrauded.

I know you have long considered yourself to be too intellectually superior to fall victim to being deliberately defrauded, but, very few of the rest of humanity can possibly aspire to reaching your level of brilliance.

Originally Posted by ProfHenryHiggins

Who is Michael Brown again? Please jog my memory; it's too common of a name to place precisely.

Sure. Here he is. His free training turns out to be I think $27 or $47. If you fail to buy his "free" training he will spam you forever and a day unless you order him to stop.

WAHT

Originally Posted by littleroundman

When ????

Probably after you show me some proof your claims are anything but your personal opinion.

I've never seen any evidence "almost all" fraud victims are anything but victims, are "striving to be at the top" of any pile, that "these things" are somehow all the same, or, indeed, how many constitute the "very few" you consider to be somehow complicit in being defrauded.

I know you have long considered yourself to be too intellectually superior to fall victim to being deliberately defrauded, but, very few of the rest of humanity can possibly aspire to reaching your level of brilliance.

No I do not claim to be intellectually superior to anyone and never have. What has saved me from falling for an internet ponzi scheme is common sense. Even my toddler great grandkids know that you cannot get five quarters out of an apple.

I am as likely to be defrauded by any off-line fraudster as anyone else, unless of course, the fraud is obvious e.g. my roof is in need of repair and needs to be replaced immediately for £1000's by my doorstep caller I can though understand some old people being frightened by that and falling for such a con. I did have such an experience from a persistent chap who kept calling and telling me that my chimney was in need of urgent re-pointing. I got so tired of this that I at last invited him in to discuss the price and then locked the door after us.I asked him to leave but he refused unless I paid up. I then phoned the police and told them I had this guy who wouldn't leave my house unless I agreed to have some work done. They duly arrived and carted him off never to be heard from again.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Even my toddler great grandkids know that you cannot get five quarters out of an apple.

So? They are taught to be like you. Why is is it so difficult for you to accept the fact that others were taught differently than you have been?

Numbers, Eddie, we want numbers

"Almost all" isn't good enough.

Perhaps you can provide us with the basis for your determination that "almost all" victims of fraud "strive to be at the top"

Oh, and while you're at it, what exactly are the "these things" of which you speak ???

Your superior intelligence and common sense aside, what you've been doing for years sounds a whole lot like blaming the victims for their misfortune and /or an arrogant assumption everybody has or should be as smart as you.

As an example, over a million TelexFree victims from all over the world, yet Eddie has determined they "almost all" deserved to be defrauded.

Must be time to expunge "fraud" from the statutes, Eddie, the victims probably deserved it anyway, according to you.

Originally Posted by E2014T

So? They are taught to be like you. Why is is it so difficult for you to accept the fact that others were taught differently than you have been?

Are there kids who are taught that there are five quarters in a whole ?

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Numbers, Eddie, we want numbers

"Almost all" isn't good enough.

Perhaps you can provide us with the basis for your determination that "almost all" victims of fraud "strive to be at the top"

Oh, and while you're at it, what exactly are the "these things" of which you speak ???

Your superior intelligence and common sense aside, what you've been doing for years sounds a whole lot like blaming the victims for their misfortune and /or an arrogant assumption everybody has or should be as smart as you.

As an example, over a million TelexFree victims from all over the world, yet Eddie has determined they "almost all" deserved to be defrauded.

Must be time to expunge "fraud" from the statutes, Eddie, the victims probably deserved it anyway, according to you.

Once again common sense should give you your answers but yes your "victims" probably did deserve it. They are all in it because of greed. Greed driven by ignorance, desperation, necessity or whatever but greed nevertheless.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Once again common sense should give you your answers but yes your "victims" probably did deserve it. They are all in it because of greed. Greed driven by ignorance, desperation, necessity or whatever but greed nevertheless.

There are kids in the world who were taught nothing about money, period. They were taught about everything about human race that makes life great, and nothing about what makes it suck.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Nice frame Roundo but I think the post would look better as graffiti on a crumbling brick wall. It looks a little out of place where it is.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Nice frame Roundo but I think the post would look better as graffiti on a crumbling brick wall. It looks a little out of place where it is.

Here you go, Roundo, SORTED! The brickwork is not exactly crumbling, in fact it is looking rather pristine. I had to call on the services of my roofing friend who gave me a good price to rebuild it. He guarantees it will not damage the palm of your right hand.

No one deserves to be scammed. No one deserves to be used in a scam. The character of the victims makes no difference. No one deserves it. Not even you.

Originally Posted by E2014T

No one deserves to be scammed. No one deserves to be used in a scam. The character of the victims makes no difference. No one deserves it. Not even you.

So pray tell why there is always so much applause that comes from Real Scam when some scam or another goes tits up ? By it's collapse it means many have lost their money.

I would like to put it on the record here and now, that while I abhor MLM's whether legal or not, they are not quite such obvious and avoidable scams as the likes of Banners Brokers. Profitable Sunrise ASD, etc etc. Those are the scams that have no victims. People could be forgiven for joining a MLM thinking they are creating a business for themselves despite all the warnings out there. It is those that sign up for such things as HYIPS and so called ad programmes and that promise outrageous rates of return with little effort that deserve to lose their money.

There is no crime in wanting to be ones own boss. On the contrary it is to be admired and encouraged , so long as it is legal and not designed to rip people off like the snake oil merchants.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

No I do not claim to be intellectually superior to anyone and never have.

Yes you do...And to just about everyone....You think just about everyone is a complete moron compared to you...

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

So says he who usually cannot spell four letter words. Where did you copy those words from, Fatso ? You are so obviously out of your depth.

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

I'm sorry but I do not know what ad nauseum means, perhaps you meant ad nauseam ? Being a school teacher, would you like to ban me for pointing that out ? Perhaps you could ask Educating Edgington to spell check your posts ?

BTW What scammers are you presently exposing ? Are Okosh and Finix giving you a helping hand ?

Is a simpleton someone who has never learnt to spell despite claiming to have degrees or is a simpleton someone who points out spelling mistakes?

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

No it doesn't, now move along Sherlock, let's have more of your rubbish..

Originally Posted by Uncle Festa

Are there kids who are taught that there are five quarters in a whole ?

Well it depends if they are being taught about buying or selling....))

So there you have the crux of the matter.

From his ivory tower, Eddie gets to decide who does or doesn't deserve to be scammed.

Apparently he knows all the fraud victims and their circumstances and can determine if they have contributed to being illegally defrauded

It's also his opinion scams shouldn't be exposed and forced to close because doing so means victims will lose money.

Screw any future victims, Eh, Eddie ??

And don't, whatever you do, celebrate the demise of a fraud, because..............well.............because..... .....Eddie says you shouldn't.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

So there you have the crux of the matter.

From his ivory tower, Eddie gets to decide who does or doesn't deserve to be scammed.

Apparently he knows all the fraud victims and their circumstances and can determine if they have contributed to being illegally defrauded

It's also his opinion scams shouldn't be exposed and forced to close because doing so means victims will lose money.

Screw any future victims, Eh, Eddie ??

And don't, whatever you do, celebrate the demise of a fraud, because..............well.............because..... .....Eddie says you shouldn't.

https://youtu.be/f3w9HlFOTNw