Thread: 2010 Blessings Part 4

i wasnt talking about the cash gifting i was talking about my actual job that i work 60 hours a week to support my family you have a oppinion but no right to contact my job he emailed my job and that is not associated with blessings, blessings does not have my work info because i do that outside of work, i dont involve my job. he crossed the line when he contacted my job by email. And dont worry about the law that whats my lawyer is for. good luck on your bashing of people your doing a great job at showing what kind of people you are your not for justice your for finding a place to gather amongst yourselves.

and for whip whoever you are hears is the law...

Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation a negative or inferior image. This can be also any disparaging statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or published, whether true or false, depending on legal state. In Common Law it is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).[1]

In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false,[2][not specific enough to verify] and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.[3] Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[4][not verified in body]

False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[5] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.[5]

In some civil law jurisdictions, defamation is dealt with as a crime rather than a civil wrong (termed a public-law delict in civil-law systems).[6] The United Nations Commission on Human Rights ruled in 2012 that the criminalization of libel violates Freedom of expression and is inconsistent with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.[7]

A person who harms another's reputation may be referred to as a "famacide", "defamer", or "slanderer". The Latin phrase famosus libellus means a libelous writing.

Originally Posted by scamseaseanddesist

i wasnt talking about the cash gifting i was talking about my actual job that i work 60 hours a week to support my family you have a oppinion but no right to contact my job he emailed my job and that is not associated with blessings, blessings does not have my work info because i do that outside of work, i dont involve my job. he crossed the line when he contacted my job by email. And dont worry about the law that whats my lawyer is for. good luck on your bashing of people your doing a great job at showing what kind of people you are your not for justice your for finding a place to gather amongst yourselves.

and for whip whoever you are hears is the law...

Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation a negative or inferior image. This can be also any disparaging statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or published, whether true or false, depending on legal state. In Common Law it is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).[1]

In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false,[2][not specific enough to verify] and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.[3] Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[4][not verified in body]

False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[5] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.[5]

In some civil law jurisdictions, defamation is dealt with as a crime rather than a civil wrong (termed a public-law delict in civil-law systems).[6] The United Nations Commission on Human Rights ruled in 2012 that the criminalization of libel violates Freedom of expression and is inconsistent with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.[7]

A person who harms another's reputation may be referred to as a "famacide", "defamer", or "slanderer". The Latin phrase famosus libellus means a libelous writing.

<sigh> We have another internet rambo lawyer. I am not a lawyer, but have been involved in 4 different lawsuits and represented myself in 2 of those. Texas does not recognize false light. I can also assure you that someone advertising very publicly on the internet could be a limited public figure in our great state. That would mean in the simplest of terms one will need to produce false statements of fact to prevail in a court case. The fact someone captured your internet postings and threw in some public record is not going to constitute a winning case.

Defamation, libel and slander are torts (civil) matters and not criminal in the USA. Before having a very public meltdown, it might have been advisable to contact a licensed attorney and file a real case rather than spouting off on an anti-scam site haunted by real lawyers and others with legal experience. I don't believe you have a lawyer as a competent attorney almost always recommend something along the lines of shut the hell up!

Soapboxmom