Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

  1. #1
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    http://www.realscam.com/f9/trend-sound-promoter-3268/

    Scammers say:
    NOTICE TO ALL INDEPENDENT PROMOTER DISTRIBUTORS FLORIDA COURT RULES REALSCAM.COM POSTING DEFAMATORY

    Trend Sound Promoter AMG Corp. filed a Motion for Declaratory Judgment on February 26, 2014 in the Second Judicial Court of Leon County, Florida. When some one publishes false information about a company under state and federal law that is called “Defamation”.

    Under federal and state law a person is free to publish their opinion about a company. This right to free speech is protected, If the information is true. It is against the law for someone to intentionally write and share information publically that they know is false with the intent to damage the company.

    The people who are spreading the negative information about TSP must hide behind false names and hidden identities because they know what they are saying is not true and would not stand up in court.

    On April 1, 2013, the Florida court entered a default judgment. The court found that what was posted in RealScam.com is false and the person who posted it broke the law. They knew this would happen which is why they did not say their real name. If they “know” that TSP is so bad why are they afraid to step up, say who they are and let the facts show the truth.

    Since court after court is ruling against them for spreading lies they have now started threatening and scare people and using their own faith against them. They do not care about the truth or what you believe they only care about what they believe and what they want you to do. Below are some of the documents from the Florida Court Ruling.
    CLERK'S DEFAULT
    PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLERK’S DEFAULT
    PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DECLARATORY ACTION
    PLAINTIFF’S COMPENDIUM OF CASES CITED IN ITS FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT
    MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT
    Our original thread is in spot 2 on Google. Colossal failure on the part of the clueless scammers! Time to carefully analyze those filings and pick them apart. I will do whatever is necewssary to keep the TSP threads on page 1.
    Last edited by Soapboxmom; 07-07-2014 at 12:56 PM. Reason: Link to new thread added.

  2. #2
    Whip's Avatar
    Whip is offline Anonymous. As are you all
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6,061

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Problem with their headline is they never proved what exactly was defamatory so how could there have been a decision, much less in their favor?

  3. #3
    littleroundman is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    17,666

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    The mention of "suing RealScam" made in the Trend Sound Promoter" announcement is a classic case of kite flying.

    The action taken by Trend Sound Promoter was against a defendant known as "Anonymous John Doe" IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA and NOT against RealScam.com

    In fact, Trend Sound Promoters own PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DECLARATORY ACTION

    points out quite clearly on page #10:

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing

  4. #4
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    when I see "Annonymous John Doe" from Florida ever posting here, no matter what he post, i will warn him that there is someone who thinks he is defamatory

  5. #5
    littleroundman is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    17,666

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    The point is, even if we removed the offending post or posts, the rest of the thread would remain
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing

  6. #6
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Quote Originally Posted by Whip View Post
    Problem with their headline is they never proved what exactly was defamatory so how could there have been a decision, much less in their favor?
    They manipulated the court, they filled a bogus case against Anonymous , for some reason in Florida, not mentioning what they find defamatory or who and making sure nobody real who can be reached is named as a defendant.
    After they manipulated court through public announcement in local Florida newspaper that there is a CASE against Anonymous John Doe,
    claiming by that the defendant was served.
    Their plan was that nobody ever respond to it and court will grant them a judgement by default.

  7. #7
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    The Plaintiff asserts that the defamatory speech, which the Plaintiff seeks a declaratory speech on it, is commercial defamation and is expressly not political speech, but speech related to tamping down competition within the competitive space.
    3. The Declaratory Judgment sought herein is only a declaration by the Court that the
    defamation within control of Florida courts is, in fact, defamatory.
    The early posts on that thread were made by folks with hundreds or thousands of posts here and across the internet. That makes the posters anonymous consumer advocates who are involved in exposing financial fraud. There is nothing to suggest that any of the posts that are included in the filings were made by a competitor. Strike one TSP and the sleazy attorney they hired.

  8. #8
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Can we demand to disbar that attorney ?

  9. #9
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    A. Minimum Contacts
    14. The allegations contacted in the Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint allege that the Defendant has caused to be published defamatory non-privileged statements in Florida via the internet.
    15. Florida Courts have held that a Defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Florida if the Defendant commits a tortuous act in the State of Florida. In Price v. Kronenberger 24 So. 3d 775; (Fla 5th DCA 2009), the Fifth District Court of Appeals held
    2 Plaintiff asserts, however, that there is no First Amendment implication to defamatory commercial speech. The defamation, over which the Plaintiff seeks a Declaratory Judgment, is clearly not political speech or speech which communicates information with general public interest.
    that a complaint which alleges a non-resident committed a tortuous act based on communications directed into Florida electronically, either by telephone or in writing, had sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Florida. In Silver v. Levinson, 648 So. 2d 240, 243-244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) stated that a: “Connecticut resident could reasonably anticipate being haled into Florida court where he sent a defamatory letter into Florida … that was “designed to have an effect” in Florida”.
    In this instance, the Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendant through the anonymous posting of defamatory, non-privilege statements via the internet, published on Google.com, via a live URL link to Realscam.com, within the State of Florida. Applying Price and Silver, the Defendant has met the minimum contacts test for the Plaintiff to obtain long arm
    jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Statute 48.193(1)(b) if the Plaintiff actually knew who Defendant Anonymous John Doe 1 was and where he was located so as to perfect in personam service. Unfortunately that is not the case here. In other words, a tort was committed in Florida, directed into Florida and the res, which is the defamatory statement,
    is digital property (or, if printed, a written instrument) present in Florida and subject to the jurisdiction of this Court.
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...yScVedgUziKa6w

    The attorney for that nut, Don Holbrook, tried to twist case law to her liking and was laughed out of court. I would bet this attorney has taken great liberty with the minimum contacts and if an answer was filed would see this case dismissed just as quickly as the one against me in Ohio was..... almost instantly!

    And, saying these posts are not "information with general public interest" is ludicrous.

  10. #10
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Docket,

    heh , they wasted $400 stolen from victims on it, after all it has no power :)

    TSP_RS_DOCKET.jpg

  11. #11
    Whip's Avatar
    Whip is offline Anonymous. As are you all
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6,061

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    I would say the 'affidavit of diligent search and inquiry' is a bogus document especially since they couldn't quote one false statement posted.

  12. #12
    JustTooMuchTime is offline Senior Scambuster
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,456
    Blog Entries
    128

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Quote Originally Posted by NikSam View Post
    They manipulated the court, they filled a bogus case against Anonymous , for some reason in Florida, not mentioning what they find defamatory or who and making sure nobody real who can be reached is named as a defendant.
    After they manipulated court through public announcement in local Florida newspaper that there is a CASE against Anonymous John Doe,
    claiming by that the defendant was served.
    Their plan was that nobody ever respond to it and court will grant them a judgement by default.
    I'm guessing they did this to prepare to request that Google deindex RealScam pages about TrendSound Promoter. If that's true, then if somebody actually responded to their lawsuit it would throw off that gameplan. Again, just a guess on my part, but it seems like that's what they're doing.

  13. #13
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Quote Originally Posted by JustTooMuchTime View Post
    I'm guessing they did this to prepare to request that Google deindex RealScam pages about TrendSound Promoter. If that's true, then if somebody actually responded to their lawsuit it would throw off that gameplan. Again, just a guess on my part, but it seems like that's what they're doing.
    Absolutely! Obviously TSP isn't bright enough to figure out that RealScam might not be receptive to being delisted due a a lawsuit filing that for all practical purposes appears to be possibly fraudulent. I have an alarming habit of moving and renaming threads and starting new ones when it suits me, so how is it they think they are going to keep discussions about their opportunity off of the first page of Google? I love a good fight and do have a bit of experience in that regard.

  14. #14
    JustTooMuchTime is offline Senior Scambuster
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,456
    Blog Entries
    128

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    TSP must be looking for one of these people:

    John Doe in Tallahassee FL | WhitePages

    John Doe in Miami FL | WhitePages

  15. #15
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Since the only notice they referenced in the ridiculous court docs was a newspaper of some sort in Tallahassee, I am sure you have found the Defendant somewhere in there! LOL!!! I would bet the method of providing notice would be shown to be improper should a licensed Florida attorney answer this bogus suit. Seems TSP will do anything to avoid having a response filed doesn't it?

  16. #16
    Whip's Avatar
    Whip is offline Anonymous. As are you all
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6,061

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Quote Originally Posted by JustTooMuchTime View Post
    This might be them:



    Or this guy:


  17. #17
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Lawyer grasping for straws writes:
    As this Court well knows from prior cases and as set forth above, the Communications
    Decency Act §230 prohibits a plaintiff, who has been defamed, from suing an Internet
    Service Provider who publishes such defamation. Accordingly, there is no remedy available
    for this Plaintiff to sue Google.com or Realscam.com and the chosen anonymity of the
    defamer makes the only remedy available to the Plaintiff, a declaration by this Court
    pursuant to Florida Statute 86 that the defamation published in Florida is in fact defamatory.
    Elements of Defamation

    Under Florida law, the elements of a defamation claim are:

    1. the defendant published a false statement;
    2. about the plaintiff;
    3. to a third party; and
    4. the falsity of the statement caused injury to the plaintiff.
    Houston we have a huge problem. There has not been a single false statement of fact identified and properly refuted, so therefore there can be no defamation. If no defamation has been proven to exist then how can we have any injury? The filing doesn't substantiate this alleged injury either from my perusal. So the filings by TSPs legal eagle looks quite like a steaming pile of dung.

  18. #18
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    The Defendant posted the Digital Defamation anonymously and
    the Courts jurisdiction arises from its “equitable chancery jurisdiction” and is
    not predicated upon the citizenship or residency of the Defendant.....The Defendant committed a tort that produced an injury in the State of
    Florida. Additionally this Court has in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction which
    is constitutionally appropriate in that the Defendant seeks only a Declaratory
    Judgment and no monetary relief. Lastly, the Defendant’s Digital Defamation
    are tortuous in and of its self and satisfy the minimum contact rules that do not
    offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”....That the Digital Defamation is false, defamatory, and speech that is otherwise
    not protected by the First Amendment. A copy of the Digital Defamation in
    its written form is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Its digital address is
    http://www.realscam.com/f8/trend-sound-promoter-2852/; That the Defendant is Ordered to Remove the Digital Defamation;
    i. That if the Defendant cannot in fact be located and cannot request that the
    Digital Defamation be removed or cannot remove the Digital Defamation
    from the Internet, the Plaintiff can submit this Order to Google, Yahoo, Bing, or any other Internet search engine so that the link can be removed from their search results pursuant to their existing policies concerning de-indexing of defamatory material;
    The TSP scammers didn't make any effort at all to find the posters on these fine threads. They even argue it doesn't matter where our fine posters reside. They could have come on here and published notice and used the private messaging system. TSP did not want any response to their garbage filings. They counted on this lawsuit flying under the radar and assumed no one would notice the results had fallen off of the Google listings. No such luck.

  19. #19
    zyzzey is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Hey Soapboxmom and other members that believe Trend Sound Promoter AMG Corp is a scam / fraud / pyramid scheme, ect...

    THANK YOU!

    Thank you for wasting your time to try to bring down the scammers that decided to create trendsoundpromoter.com! Around July 2013, my friend presented me with a work from home oppurunity, that'll only take a few minutes a day and will earn me $0.40 per email, The more I invested in the company (I mean purchase "Ad-Promoting Package"), the more I would earn. This was last July.. I told him I'd pass on the oppurtunity.. Then he calls me up 2 weeks ago and pratically begs me to signup under his Promoter link.. I asked him what was going and he told me that he isn't meeting his 3% Music Sale requirement and the only way he can do that is is to signup a new promoter. Otherwise, he'd get terminated as a TSP Distributor.

    This company is a huge ass scam and the only reason the government hasn't shut it down is because their taxes look in order.
    Trend Sound Promoter sends a 1099-MISC form at the end of the year reporting how much money Trend Sound Promoter paid you. And TSP reports to the IRS they generated this much in revenue, paid out less, they make profit and all seems in order.

    I honestly don't know how they continue to operate and why the government hasn't stepped in.



    The State of Washington REQUIRES all businesses to report a actual STREET ADDRESS (e.g not allowing a PO BOX for a business location). Trend Sound Promoter doesn't actual rent, lease, own or have ever stepped foot in the "Corporate Offices" they claim to have in Miami FL & Bellevue WA. Can the Washington Secretary of State / Department of revenue require them to list their actual business location?

  20. #20
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Sneaky bastards , who do they think they are? - TelexFree ? :)

    Bankruptcy ???? really ??? think it is gonna save you ?

    TSP_Bankriptcy.jpg

  21. #21
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

  22. #22
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    They filed quite the hilarious motion. TSP hopes the judge will agree that the reps they have defrauded will only get e-mails instead of snail mail as they apparently think the postage for sending out 5000 notices would be staggering.

    Attachment 7542

  23. #23
    Whip's Avatar
    Whip is offline Anonymous. As are you all
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6,061

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    I'm not going to demand anyone visit my website or call me but I will say victims need to contact Sarah at sarah.flynn@usdoj.gov. All I have as evidence is what has been posted. She needs first hand knowledge of the workings. It needs to be done now. I only suggested they look into the workings of this before just granting bankruptcy.

  24. #24
    NikSam is offline AntiCon Artist
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,258

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Some activity on this case (TSP vs. John Doe 1):
    Looks like June 12 will be a court hearing.


    TSP_JDOE_may12.jpg

  25. #25
    Soapboxmom's Avatar
    Soapboxmom is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,021
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Trend Sound Promoter Bogus Lawsuit Google Ranking Battle with Realscam

    Full Case View Previous Page
    37 2014 CA 000481 - TREND SOUND PROMOTER vs ANONYMOUS JOHN DOE I

    Status Party Party Code Attorney
    ANONYMOUS JOHN DOE I , DEFENDANT PRO SE
    TREND SOUND PROMOTER , PLAINTIFF STEVEN R ANDREWS

    Action Dscr Status Status Date Disposition Disposition Date Judge
    OTHER LIBEL SLANDER CLOS 2/21/2014 DEFAULT & FINAL JUDGMENT 6/12/2014 FRANCIS

    Charge # Action Code Description Plea Date Plea Decision Date Court Action Charge Disposition Citation

    Judges Appearing on Case
    Last Name First Name Date Assigned Source
    FRANCIS CHARLES 2/21/2014 3:40:58 PM BM

    Docket Table Headers Are Sortable. Click For Ascending, Again For Descending Order
    Source Table Abbreviations: BM = Benchmark; JIS = Justice Informations System
    Docket Date Docket Code Docket Text OR Book OR Page Amount Amount Due Source
    2/21/2014 a002 JUDGE FRANCIS, CHARLES A: ASSIGNED $0.00 $0.00 BM
    2/21/2014 CCS CIVIL COVER SHEET $0.00 $0.00 BM
    2/21/2014 COMP_CA COMPLAINT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    2/21/2014 RECEIPT PAYMENT $400.00 RECEIPT #884364 $0.00 $0.00 BM
    2/24/2014 AODS AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENT SEARCH AND INQUIRY $0.00 $0.00 BM
    2/26/2014 NOAC NOTICE OF ACTION - NO COPIES OR ENVELOPES PROVIDED $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/1/2014 MODEF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLERK’S DEFAULT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/3/2014 DEFT DEFAULT ISSUED (COPIES IN ATTORNEY BOX) $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 MELA PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DECLARATORY ACTION $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 MFFJ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 NOF NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S COMPENDIUM OF CASES CITED IN ITS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S COMPENDIUM OF CASES CITED IN ITS FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/4/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S COMPENDIUM OF CASES CITED IN ITS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/8/2014 NEWVOLUME VOLUME 1 CREATED $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/8/2014 NEWVOLUME VOLUME 2 CREATED $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/8/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING MATERIALS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    4/11/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING COURT’S ORDER IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    5/7/2014 NOH PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF HEARING $0.00 $0.00 BM
    5/14/2014 NOF PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING MATERIALS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT $0.00 $0.00 BM
    6/12/2014 RECEIPT PAYMENT $21.00 RECEIPT #919434 $0.00 $0.00 BM
    6/12/2014 FIJU FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT - Recorded (OR 4679.370 / 20140049901) 4679 370 $0.00 $0.00 BM

    Event Date Start Location Judge Result Source
    MOTION HEARING 6/12/2014 9:00 AM C FRANCIS CANCELLED BM
    MOTION HEARING - Plaintiff's M for Entry of Final Default Judgmenet

    Docket Application Owed Paid Dismissed Due
    COMPLAINT $400.00 $400.00 $0.00 $0.00
    COPIES $15.00 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00
    CERTIFYING COPIES IN PUBLIC RECORD $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 $0.00

    Ar Plan
    Ordered Amt Paid Dismissed Balance Delinquent

    Ar Schedule
    Schedule Date Amt Owed Amt Paid Paid Date

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed on this website are solely those of their respective authors.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42