Thread: FlexKom aka Flexcom aka Weeconomy - legitimate MLM or scam ??

Stewart I can respect your post. It is clear what you have determined for your self. You are expressing your view on here is it should be expressed. You give a concise explanation of why you think FlexKom is a scam. You also gave the reader a clue to what they should do by showing them there is a process to finding for yourself what is the truth. This is different from the mob mentality on this board. Maybe they are so used to it now they don't see hwtathey are doing, but it reminds me of the old time lynching mentality. Some one said someone did something and a gang got together with a rope and took the law into their own hands.

FlexKom have attorneys who are experts on compliance for a good reason. There are laws already in place. Those laws can't be broken without running the risk of the attorney general showing up at the offices and shutting FlexKom down. It would happen without trial. In fact in 20 countries it has not happened and FlexKom is 4 /12 years old now. To call us "pimps and "scammers"without a verdict in court is based on their opinions. It is not backed by a verdict in court anywhere in the world. There is not even a complaint from any governing agency in the world about FlexKom and every country we are in we have been approved to operate as the way we do. So it is clear it is bullying that is going on here. It's justified in what they feel is legal and what they think about FlexKom but never the less it is not supported by a single complaint or verdict anywhere. Guilty until proven innocent a very backwards way to see things. Why not instead of us bending backwards to prove innocence from your judgments why not anyone on here show os any proof of criminal activity. I don't mean accusations there are list of accusations on here and spins of every kind of deception but just a lot of accusations nothing real. I would imagine if it was real it would be in court by now. They would like to have us believe that the owners are so slick that that the regulatory agencies are not able to get them. We are talking about the government here.

At one point the government fought Amway in court based on their business model. What came out of that trial was a set of rules and guidelines. It has been altered throughout the years. But we have a set of rules to follow. The compliance attorneys are experts on this and make sure we follow every rule in place.

I know why it is done this way on here. It is just a custom to go after blood. When they smell blood it gets them excited it is the chase that drives them and it gets out of hand. The mob gets riled up, they like the power it gives them. They forget to think about the outside world and that we have a place already that handles this stuff. So in here it's just a lynching party.

So thank you for being on the other side of this and being clear to people about what you stand for.

So that everyone understands how it works on the side of a company such as ours.
The last thing a company wants is to be shut down without trial by the attorney general, which they have the power to do. If they close the doors, even if the company is innocent, you can kiss the whole company goodbye and everyone will lose. This is a day not a single company wants to have. So they keep things very strict for that reason.

If the people on here have a problem with the guidelines of MLM they should also let everyone know they have a view different from what has been determined by a jury and ruled on based on what the people want. As far as opinions goes anyone can have an opinion. I can have an opinion that it should be illegal to be gay and call people words for being gay. But still there is a law that says differently. I can express I think it is wrong to be gay, but when I start name calling it is not about what my opinion is anymore it is attacking someone for what they do or believe in. So until a company is really determined by a court somewhere in the world to be illegal, calling us "pimps" and 'scammers" is simply bullying justified by their own opinion about what FlexKom is and it it is in no way supported by any verdicts anywhere in the world.

Originally Posted by watsco

FlexKom have attorneys who are experts on compliance for a good reason. There are laws already in place. Those laws can't be broken without running the risk of the attorney general showing up at the offices and shutting FlexKom down.

For the people coming here undecided about flexkom, consider the quote below before being swayed by an attorney's stamp of approval.


"In December 2007, ASD hired an Internet marketing firm, USHBB, and made a series of videos promoting ASD, which started to appear on Youtube in March 2008, where Bowdoin and members told everybody that a lawyer (later identified as Robert Garner) had vetted the firm, it's not a Ponzi, but a safe and profitable opportunity. The lawyer then appeared on the video proclaiming the same thing."

For those of you who are newbies to scams, ASD Ad surf daily's owner Andy Bowdoin convicted of running an illegal ponzi scheme. If I'm not mistaken, Zeek Rewards touted the same.

Watsco, please provide the name of the firm/attorneys you are referencing as experts. I assume you have checked this out already for yourself since you know so much about this flexcom "opportunity".

Originally Posted by Char

Watsco, please provide the name of the firm/attorneys you are referencing as experts. I assume you have checked this out already for yourself since you know so much about this flexcom "opportunity".

If watsco turns out to be unable to do so, I can also provide these names and even the documents this laywer has written and then signed. Ofcourse, this comes with free debunking of said article.

But first things first, I am eager to find out how watsco is going to reply to the conviction of one of Flexkom's former pimps in Turkey. Bet Flexkom did not told him this. Weird that I had to tell him this, one would expect that watsco had done really good research on Flexkom.

Originally Posted by watsco

In fact in 20 countries it has not happened and FlexKom is 4 /12 years old now. ... They would like to have us believe that the owners are so slick that that the regulatory agencies are not able to get them. We are talking about the government here.

Firstly, this idea that "they've been going X years, and so far no government intervention."

This is presented as if it were a point in favour of FlexKom (or whatever scheme is under discussion). It is not.

White collar crime, such as fraud, can take years and years to be fully resolved. The case I'm involved with dates back to 2008/2009. And there have been minor points where we're been to court, such as to force a bank to hand over account details. But mainly it's still with a company of forensic accountants. It is slow, painstaking, bureaucratic work. There could be several further years before we get to the bottom of it.

A prime example is Bernard Madoff, whose fraud began in the mid-1980's and wasn't discovered until 2008.

But you're right, nobody is saying that the guys at FlexKom are as "slick" in business & finance as Madoff was.

Originally Posted by watsco

... Why not instead of us bending backwards to prove innocence from your judgments why not anyone on here show os any proof of criminal activity. ...

The answer to this one is easy, and I already hinted at it in my previous post. Joining FlexKom is not like a court of law, where you are being threatened with a fine or jail. It is an operation where FlexKom are trying to persuade us to give them our money. We don't have to give them our money. We can walk away for any reason and no reason.

If FlexKom want the investment money, it is incumbent upon them to convince us that it is a good idea. That is why it there is an apparency of "guilty until proven innocent".

FlexKom are taking money from people - that much is not disputed by anybody.

The burden of proof is reversed then: you should be able to give people good reasons to part with their money, rather than asking them to give you reasons why should keep their money. I don't need a reason to keep my money in my wallet. You need to give me a good reason to take it out.

Originally Posted by Stewart

I don't need a reason to keep my money in my wallet. You need to give me a good reason to take it out.

and none of these scammers can do that. They are going to be abysmal failures if they need to rely on sales and can't answer the simplest of questions like the ones posed here.