Thread: Traffic monsoon. Better than MAPS with trusted admin Charles Scoville

Originally Posted by EagleOne

Uh Michael, if you had listened to us "haters" instead of denigrating us as not knowing what we were talking about and all your other mantra and listened to us, you would have been able to get your money back.

LOL, IF he had some bacon he'd have some bacon and eggs...IF he had some eggs!!! IF these clowns had a working moral compass and the brains that the Lord gave a gladiola plant the scam industry would be much smaller!

Originally Posted by EagleOne

Uh Michael, if you had listened to us "haters" instead of denigrating us as not knowing what we were talking about and all your other mantra and listened to us, you would have been able to get your money back.

What, and admit he was conned ????

Nah, never happen.

Much easier to blame Paypal, the SEC, Judge Parrish and anyone else he can think of.

Is Allied refunding this $ to avoid litigation via SEC?

Originally Posted by littleroundman

What, and admit he was conned ????

Nah, never happen.

Much easier to blame Paypal, the SEC, Judge Parrish and anyone else he can think of.

So would it be correct to say, "he was conned," or "he was A con?" Methinks the second is more correct!

Originally Posted by Fat City, LA

Is Allied refunding this $ to avoid litigation via SEC?

Maybe Allied Wallet didn't get notified yet?

Preliminary_Injunction.jpg

Willie Wonky didn't read the Finding of Facts in the Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Preliminary Injunction...

William_G_Bryant.jpg
William_G_Bryant_001.jpg

Willie Wonky is nothing but a keyboard warrior who likes to talk smack...

William_G_Bryant_002.jpg

Bryant's problem is he's too many wannabe professionals: attorney, accountant, philosopher, mathematician, and psychic; while failing at all of them.

Originally Posted by EagleOne

Bryant's problem is he's too many wannabe professionals: attorney, accountant, philosopher, mathematician, and psychic; while failing at all of them.

It woud seem that Willy's head has displaced neutronium as the densest material in the universe!

Originally Posted by Bestbud

Willie Wonky thinks the Judge just doesn't understand the cycle of economics like he does...

Attachment 18617
Attachment 18618

Jeez, we just have to get this clown to the court room , i want to see him to make an ass of himself in front of the judge

Originally Posted by NikSam

Jeez, we just have to get this clown to the court room , i want to see him to make an ass of himself in front of the judge

I sooooooooooooo wish Scovilles' lawyers would become desperate enough that they'd subpoena him.

It would be worth the cost of airfare just to sit in the public gallery.

Meanwhile over in the land of misfit toys. .
https://scovillelegaldefensefund.wor...tal-donations/

Originally Posted by Fat City, LA

Meanwhile over in the land of misfit toys. .
https://scovillelegaldefensefund.wordpress.com/total-donations/

The one man fillibuster continues...
Chirley is off his rocker.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/104957...33034990063975

Originally Posted by Fat City, LA

The one man fillibuster continues...
Chirley is off his rocker.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/104957...33034990063975

You know, one day Charlie is going to post something that is actually relevant to the case.

Something that is happening in the real world, and not in the fantasy world inside his head.

It's not a bad strategy though.

Include as many lies, half truths and completely irrelevant details in a post so that nobody can be bothered breaking it down to reply.

Keeps the faithful faithful, I suppose

One of the most common diversionary tactics used by fraudsters and ponzi pimps is the use of "STRAWMAN" arguments to confuse their victims

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.
One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.

Here's a perfect example used by Weird Willy Bryant in defense of his hero, Charlie Scoville.



* Scoville hasn't been charged with "running a ponzi"

* Weird Willys' definition of a "ponzi" is totally and utterly incorrect, anyway.



We don't even need to get into what constitutes "work"

Clicking on ads, as has been proven in previous cases isn't "work" , it's a meaningless task.

Scoville might as well have asked members to stand in the corner on their head while whistling the theme to "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid"

I just don't understand this "the Judge and the SEC are corrupt; they want to steal TM's money" mentality.

TM 140 Apr 17.jpg

And why is Chazza even bothering to appeal? If he's soooo short of money?

But I suppose it's easier to think that corruption and conspiricy is behind the fall of TM, rather than think that you've been an idiot, and have been fooled by someone who has run other failing schemes?

The wonderfueled Muhammad Maf Rahman owning Charles like only he can:


17761134_738820586286839_2870079131317680364_o.jpg


Sad thing is, you can already just envision Scovillain's tried-and-tested, logic-defying, yawn-inducing, copy n' pasted, rehashed rhetorical response to this before he even posts it underneath

Wrong again, young Welsh ponzi pimp.

* These are CIVIL charges. The SEC doesn't have the authority to ask for a gaol term. Civil charges can only result in fines, disgorgement, freezing of assets and receivership.

*It's done this way (civil charges followed by criminal charges at a later time ) to ensure the fraud is stopped and proceeds frozen. Criminal charges often take three or four years to make it to court, giving the offender/s plenty of time to dispose of the proceeds of crime and disappear.
That's why CIVIL charges are filed and an emergency injunction is granted

Here's a timeline to consider:

Ad Surf Daily begins = 2006

Ad Surf Daily raided by US Secret Service and closed = 2008

Andy Bowdoin criminally indicted = 2010

Andy Bowdoin pleads guilty = 2012

Andy Bowdoin jailed = 2013

And another:

Zeek Rewards

SEC charges and emergency asset freeze Aug. 17, 2012

Paul Burks indicted criminally 24 Oct 2014

Paul Burks convicted criminally July 21, 2016

Paul Burks sentenced 13 Feb 2017

Originally Posted by JackTolerance

The wonderfueled Muhammad Maf Rahman owning Charles like only he can:


17761134_738820586286839_2870079131317680364_o.jpg


Sad thing is, you can already just envision Scovillain's tried-and-tested, logic-defying, yawn-inducing, copy n' pasted, rehashed rhetorical response to this before he even posts it underneath

Great stuff. I wish he might have added:

Ask "yourself" if you want proof. Did you join TM to buy a bunch of shoes, or earn money?

It is the member himself who can prove to "himself" that it was a Ponzi. He knows he joined to make money and not buy shoes.

Simple enough question, but I wonder if some haven't thought about this? Being so brainwashed and all.

Charles will do what he always does, blow this off as a person who doesn't understand how TM worked and it is not the same comparison at all. When challenged on this early in 2016 that's what he and stacy did every time. Heck, stacy even did it here a couple of times. It's all they know how to do. Can't let facts get in the way of a good BS reply. Bad for business and recruiting; and now defending your Ponzi when you were beat down in court.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Wrong again, young Welsh ponzi pimp.

* These are CIVIL charges. The SEC doesn't have the authority to ask for a gaol term. Civil charges can only result in fines, disgorgement, freezing of assets and receivership.

*It's done this way (civil charges followed by criminal charges at a later time ) to ensure the fraud is stopped and proceeds frozen. Criminal charges often take three or four years to make it to court, giving the offender/s plenty of time to dispose of the proceeds of crime and disappear.
That's why CIVIL charges are filed and an emergency injunction is granted

Here's a timeline to consider:



And another:

Shame on you for heaping all those facts on poor Darren!What an unfair way to treat such a fine, upstanding member of the ponzi community!

Charles thinks he talking to the Judge on his Facebook personal profile now...

Charles_Scoville.jpg
Charles_Scoville_001.jpg

Yet another misleading post from Charlie Scoville.



* That's NOT what the judge "basically said"

* That's NOT what the law says.

* That's NOT what ponzis and other fraudulent schemes do.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Yet another misleading post from Charlie Scoville.



* That's NOT what the judge "basically said"

* That's NOT what the law says.

* That's NOT what ponzis and other fraudulent schemes do.

Has he posted any that were not misleading? Just askin'...