Thread: Working with Motor club of America

Originally Posted by littleroundman

So, if an "associate" earns 1% of his/her income from "sales" and 99% of his/her income from "recruitment" that would be OK by you, then ???

SMART potential MCA recruits won't believe a "nudge, wink" compliance with the FTC regulations is an indicator of legitimacy.

Get-rich-quickers, on the other hand, will continue to spruik the benefits of endless chain recruiting, MCA style.

The problem is the very fact Motor Club of America members CAN earn based largely on recruiting and the MCA refuses to close the loophole in their business model which allows endless chain recruiting to take place.

Endless chain / pyramid schemes are illegal because they don't work for most participants and are based on lies and misrepresentation.

Participate at your own peril.

The distribution of income is entirely dependent on the associate, not MCA. My personal distribution is roughly 66% consumer 33% recruitment, not including downline commissions. MCA itself does not push recruitment like many MLM company leaders do.

Regardless, our discussions here are rather futile. Take Herbalife for example, which also has extreme potential from recruitment-backed income. Publicly traded company with real investors, and hedge fund managers can't even decide if it's a pyramid scheme or not, with one hedge fund buying shares of HLF to support its legitimacy.

So if prominent players in the financial field can't even agree on the legality of MLM, this thread - and frankly, maybe even the forum - is quite unnecessary, considering it would be unwise anyway to take legal advice on a forum from someone you don't even know, including myself.

Originally Posted by artizhay

The distribution of income is entirely dependent on the associate, not MCA. My personal distribution is roughly 66% consumer 33% recruitment, not including downline commissions. MCA itself does not push recruitment like many MLM company leaders do.

Regardless, our discussions here are rather futile. Take Herbalife for example, which also has extreme potential from recruitment-backed income. Publicly traded company with real investors, and hedge fund managers can't even decide if it's a pyramid scheme or not, with one hedge fund buying shares of HLF to support its legitimacy.

So if prominent players in the financial field can't even agree on the legality of MLM, this thread - and frankly, maybe even the forum - is quite unnecessary, considering it would be unwise anyway to take legal advice on a forum from someone you don't even know, including myself.

After carefully reading this post, Christmas Turkey comes to my mind. Just my humble opinion! Yep! Christmas Turkey!