It has been brought to my attention that a thread was started at another site in my honor (well, in their minds, dishonor).
The title of the thread was, “Anti-MLM’ers...are they dishonest?” So I went and had a look see.
A few pertinent quotes:
Sure, I’ll be happy to.After watching, you would have no doubt he thinks it doesnt work.
Great....but if you look along the Youtube sidebar there is a longer version of the same video. Watch it and see how the Doctor indeed does support the use of the wand, very strongly.
Amazing isnt it, how you can edit and take things out of context to ''prove'' your points.
Its also pretty dishonest, especially coming from people who like to paint us MLM'ers as............dishonest!!!
I'm sure when cornered he'll say it was just a big joke, just trying to be cute.
I guess form Emet's perspective, when one's an official scambuster, one must take matters into their own hands to expose the "truth"!?
You dont see the dishonesty of a video that is edited to completely change the view of the person on the video then?
Pretty embarrassing for the poor eejit who thought he was clever cutting 30 seconds from the original video.
No, my thread was only to show one thing, how some anti MLM eejit cut 30 seconds from a video to show a guy saying the product doesnt work, when in reality, in the full film he is promoting it.
It was to show the dishonesty of that person, and also to point out that someone had posted the 30 second version on ''the other forum'', probably innocently believing it was a truthful video.
Emet, you now stand accused of deliberately posting your edited video (if it was you who edited it, as is being said) of the Amega Wand doctor claiming it doesn't work because you're an Anti-MLM zealot. It really seems like you are dishonestly trying to prove a false point.
Care to elaborate?
1. When I posted the video, I stated I found it over at the JREF forums, where the discussion mainly centered around the woo science of "Teh Magic Stick", not the fact that it was being sold through an MLM.
2. If I had started the thread here, I personally would have started it in the Science category, since that is really the main issue: Science woo.
3. Anyone over the age of 11 can readily see that the video is heavily edited. It is very choppy, not to deceive anyone into thinking the “good doctor” believes that "Teh Magic Stick" is ineffective, but to make a point.
4. Anyone over the age of 12 knows they can click on the youtube logo on an embedded video, and watch the video over at youtube directly, where the original video exists in its unedited form.
5. Anyone over the age of 13 can recognize the point of the edited version, which is at the end of the edited video and on screen for several seconds, in big red font: “And that’s all you need to know really”.
6. I wasn’t trying to be deceptive, and neither was the poster of the video IMO, since it is right along side the original video (which I knew, since I had seen the original video long before I saw the edited version).
On a personal note: if you read my posts here or on other forums, you may find that while I occasionally resort to snark and sarcasm, I rarely (if ever) engage in ad hominem attacks, and mostly post polite rebuttals with links provided to source my research. (I’m sure you can find an exception if you dig enough-but if you can, and it was pointed out to me, you will find that I acknowledged it).
You can resort to name calling, broad generalizations about me with pejorative labels to your heart’s content—it matters not to me.
I can imagine this post will be read and shredded, and again, it matters not to me. If any of my accusers wish to engage me directly in a calm, polite, and courteous discussion about anything I have posted, I would welcome it—but won’t hold my breath...
Bookmarks