Thanks Thanks:  0
LMAO LMAO:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Ignorant Ignorant:  0
Moron Moron:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Poor Hazel Peppergood

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,461
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    128

    Poor Hazel Peppergood

    Poor Hazel Peppergood, from humble work at home scam beginnings (circa 2000) of telling people that they can "Work At Home & Make Up To $1,872.00 Each & Every Week" with Home Mailings
    Work At Home & Make Up To $1,872.00 Each & Every Week!

    to finally being fakely seen on NBC, USAToday, and CNN, and abc
    Real Work At Home Jobs

    It must have come as quite a shock to them that it only took 12 years for them to possibly get the
    attention of the FTC

    ERSP Refers Advertising for Hazel Peppergood Work-at-Home System to FTC for Further Review After Marketer Fails to Respond to ERSP Inquiry | Advertising Self-Regulation Council

    As one Hazel Peppergood shilling Marie Jensen stated on WhyDoWork (and other places):

    "Hazel Pepperwood"
    "Hazel Pepperwood"
    "Hazel Pepperwood"

    Marie Jensen bad shill lessons
    Is this a scam- Real Home Mailing Jobs : Job Leads and Employer Discussion
    work at home job scam: is hazel peppergood a scam
    Hazel Peppergood Complaint - Materials Ordered But Never Received - Work At Home

    etc, etc.

  2. Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,461
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    128

    Re: Poor Hazel Peppergood

    Wow. It's still around.

    For some reasno, good ol' Hazel didn't respond to the ESRP's request for documentation backing up advertising claims:
    https://www.truthinadvertising.org/h...t-home-system/

  4. Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,213
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Poor Hazel Peppergood

    Quote Originally Posted by JustTooMuchTime View Post
    Wow. It's still around.

    For some reasno, good ol' Hazel didn't respond to the ESRP's request for documentation backing up advertising claims:
    https://www.truthinadvertising.org/h...t-home-system/
    Now if you substitute k's for double g's and a w for the g ya got something!
    It seems like in this "industry" common sense is not all that common!

  6. Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •