Thread: Traffic monsoon. Better than MAPS with trusted admin Charles Scoville

Originally Posted by littleroundman

It looks like Charlie Scoville is going down the "use up every possible delaying tactic" route, so we can expect at least another two or three years of stacy transitioning from serial ponzi pimp to serial pest before this comes to its' inevitable conclusion.

What else can the poor guy do ???

His hero has been caught red handed, so stacy has to resort to using as many strawman and diversionary arguments as he can dream up.

Fair enough, we can wait.

lynndel is my hero what did he get caught doing ?


and i see you guys are still clairvoyant predicting future events ..

stacy, what you need to know about Elena, Abrasax. Finix, ET2014, is that you don't know if she was playing you or not. She has on more than one occasion said she plays whichever side of the fence she wants to get information. So one never knows what she is really thinking or what her position truly is. The problem is we will never know if she was or not, and really it doesn't matter. But one thing is certain, and that is she has wild and wide mood swings and you never know which one is going to show up. She has more mood swings than some people have underwear.

Originally Posted by EagleOne

stacy, what you need to know about Elena, Abrasax. Finix, ET2014, is that you don't know if she was playing you or not. She has on more than one occasion said she plays whichever side of the fence she wants to get information. So one never knows what she is really thinking or what her position truly is. The problem is we will never know if she was or not, and really it doesn't matter. But one thing is certain, and that is she has wild and wide mood swings and you never know which one is going to show up. She has more mood swings than some people have underwear.

yes i have seen her have those with some of you guys but im very polite and i show patience with everyone and i try not to be disrespectful towards others . . i have not had her launch any mood swings my way , in a very long time.. . she gives back to me what I give her . if im polite she is the same .. ..

but thats it nothing is promised ..
you still never answered my small question
is my non guaranteed wages considered debt owed by the company ?

Originally Posted by stacy532

but thats it nothing is promised ..

Yet another misleading "fact" being used as a distraction by Scoville and his posse of pimps. (That would include you, stacy)

"Guaranteed" and / or "promised" or not, Scoville has been paying it since day one.

None of this is about what Scoville "said" it's about what he "did"

That's why it's called "fraud" and "to defraud"

Originally Posted by stacy532

but thats it nothing is promised ..

#meaningless

Originally Posted by stacy532

is my non guaranteed wages

Sadly once again you are wrong, once your wages have been "earned" they are in a sense guaranteed. Remember that story you told us about your days as a burger flipper and the boss that was cheating employees? The one were you sued, and had a car?

Originally Posted by stacy532

considered debt owed by the company ?

It's considered accounts payable, same as the $600,000,000 Scoville pretended to "share" with clickaroos. If it had to be borrowed to be paid, it would be considered debt.

It's so funny seeing Charles, Mama Scamville and various other "leaders" squirm and try and delete these direct questions.
I've seen this question asked a few times, and nobody has attempted to answer this simple question:

Traffic Monsoon Ponzi maths

It's amazing how many just blindly follow.

Jose Nunes is now urging people to file a lawsuit against the SEC.

Good catch, AffiliateGuy,



Where to Find Wealth

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Good catch, AffiliateGuy,



Where to Find Wealth

And just think, all the above did not include: All of Charles' airfare for his trips, hotel costs in Dubai for a month, food, leasing houses, buying cars, utility costs, etc. for him and his son. I would have added in his marriage license, but he was too broke to pay for it himself and a friend had to pay for it, well according to Charles that is.

It doesn't matter how much good evidence and logic you put in front of Stacy... he just keeps on paddling up the River De Nile. (As you say, he's come this far, what choice does the poor guy have?)

Remember that I recently reminded him of how last year he himself presented detailed calculation examples on the TM LLC forum - arguing that TM would have to have at least 30% income from "other than ad packs" in order not to be a Ponzi. When presented with this reminder, along with the fact that Charles told the SEC it's 0.4%, Stacy of course ignored the point completely and come out with some other distraction argument. Sad, but then what did I expect!?

Mind you, more and more now he does seem to be going down the common Ponzi pimp avenue of "<insert Revshare here> is not a Ponzi, but anyway life / banks / governments are all Ponzis so even if it was then it's no worse". LOL

Originally Posted by stephenjgray

Mind you, more and more now he does seem to be going down the common Ponzi pimp avenue of "<insert Revshare here> is not a Ponzi, but anyway life / banks / governments are all Ponzis so even if it was then it's no worse". LOL

HeHe,

yeah, well, it's not like they have any new arguments.

It's all been said and done before, tested in the courts and found to be nonsense.

Originally Posted by stephenjgray

It doesn't matter how much good evidence and logic you put in front of Stacy... he just keeps on paddling up the River De Nile. (As you say, he's come this far, what choice does the poor guy have?)

Remember that I recently reminded him of how last year he himself presented detailed calculation examples on the TM LLC forum - arguing that TM would have to have at least 30% income from "other than ad packs" in order not to be a Ponzi. When presented with this reminder, along with the fact that Charles told the SEC it's 0.4%, Stacy of course ignored the point completely and come out with some other distraction argument. Sad, but then what did I expect!?

Mind you, more and more now he does seem to be going down the common Ponzi pimp avenue of "<insert Revshare here> is not a Ponzi, but anyway life / banks / governments are all Ponzis so even if it was then it's no worse". LOL

Facts are stacy's kryptonite, and that's why he avoids them.

Wonder if stacy would take a job with a company that says: You're hired. I will pay you "X dollars per hour" provided that the company makes a profit. If not, you won't get paid. BUT we need you to keep on working for us because we know we will make a profit one day; and when we do we'll pay you what we owe you? Wanna bet he would turn it down?

I like William. He's always full of good ideas, isn't he??

TM 321 Sept 16.jpg

But look how he is describing himself.....

TM 322 Sept 16.jpg

"Former"?? Do you mean - gasp! - that you are no longer involved with TM?? How shocking!

Originally Posted by Della Cate

I like William. He's always full of good ideas, isn't he??

TM 321 Sept 16.jpg

But look how he is describing himself.....

TM 322 Sept 16.jpg

"Former"?? Do you mean - gasp! - that you are no longer involved with TM?? How shocking!

why have none of these mental midget approached real businesses like Bed, Bath, and Beyond, Home Depot, Lowes, Walmart? it's allegedly real advertising right? lmao

Originally Posted by Della Cate

I like William. He's always full of good ideas, isn't he??

TM 321 Sept 16.jpg

In his dreamland he better bet on Trump, who promised to "deregulate businesses" and pretty much got himself affiliated with fraud on multiple occasions.

Originally Posted by EagleOne

Facts are stacy's kryptonite, and that's why he avoids them.

Wonder if stacy would take a job with a company that says: You're hired. I will pay you "X dollars per hour" provided that the company makes a profit. If not, you won't get paid. BUT we need you to keep on working for us because we know we will make a profit one day; and when we do we'll pay you what we owe you? Wanna bet he would turn it down?

let's not forget he would have to first pay them.

Originally Posted by EagleOne

Facts are stacy's kryptonite, and that's why he avoids them.

Wonder if stacy would take a job with a company that says: You're hired. I will pay you "X dollars per hour" provided that the company makes a profit. If not, you won't get paid. BUT we need you to keep on working for us because we know we will make a profit one day; and when we do we'll pay you what we owe you? Wanna bet he would turn it down?

You forgot to mention that Stacy would need to pay $50 (or more if he wants a bigger salary) for such a privilege to get that job where his future salary is not guranteed.

Originally Posted by littleroundman

Yet another misleading "fact" being used as a distraction by Scoville and his posse of pimps. (That would include you, stacy)

"Guaranteed" and / or "promised" or not, Scoville has been paying it since day one.

None of this is about what Scoville "said" it's about what he "did"

That's why it's called "fraud" and "to defraud"

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

So if your boss comes along and says the server is down or your money is stuck in the payment processor, or he was hacked, or, or, or, are you going to continue to work for him without pay for 90 days, or 180 days or whatever? And yet you'll buy all that nonsense from someone on the net that you've likely never met...fascinating!

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

I'm confused.....
If members only get paid when "the sales support it" then how come members got paid when the sales in monsoon clearly could NOT support it??....

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

What your employer does or doesn't do makes no difference.

Charlie Scoville and Traffic Monsoon are accused of committing fraud, not Mrs Bairds bakery.

Hypothetical events involving other parties are irrelevant.

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

Be sure to tell Charles to use this in his defense at his hearing on 11/1. He'll have the US Attorneys quaking in their shoes with this revelation.

I don't know why Charles went to all the trouble of hiring a SEC attorney since he has you and William providing him all the ammo he needs for his defense to win.

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

guy are you serious? did u ever had a real job? unlike TM scam a real job comes with a real contract wich is a guarantee you will get payd for the duration of the contract, dosent matter if ur boss have or not money, a contract is a contract, thats why you have social services that protects the workers and where a bankroopt company employers are payd by the goverment and the owner put in prison till pay the full debt.

You guy are beyond retarded living in a fantasy world or 3rd shithole of a countrie where scamming is a normal thing, you should exit ur mama basement and take a look at the real world and even try to get a job, beliveme having a job is more satisfying than stealing money and scamming ppl.

Originally Posted by Scamville

guy are you serious?

stacy may well be serious, although I sincerely doubt it.

The main problem, however, is that none of what he says is relevant to the case against Scoville or Traffic Monsoon.

Who cares what a bakery in Texas does ???

To say that Traffic Monsoon is "like" Mrs Baird's Bakery in any way, shape or form is completely misleading and disrespectful of the honest, hardworking bakery owners and staff.

Originally Posted by stacy532

Baby steps u must take
Are my wages guaranteed or promised in the future just because i earned them in the past. ?

Or is it like the monsoon we will only get paid if sales support it ?

Its ok for my job to be in debt by the millions to pay wages and expenses not yet earned but if the monsoon is in debt to pay a future not earned yet 5 bucks to its ad clickers is a ponzi ... Lol

So you were hoping that Charles one day magicaly turns .04% of "real" sales to at least 51% ?
And meanwhile will pay you with your own money and money of others in line for the great future ?

You perfectly know ( in Charles own words) that "sales" did not support anything he paid back , money were recycled back to the suckers, generating only future debt (at some point he would say Game Over - no sales, nothing to share, but in the real world we call it Ponzi colapse )