LMAO LMAO:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Ignorant Ignorant:  0
Moron Moron:  0
Results 1 to 25 of 16962

Thread: Banners Broker HYIP ponzi scam

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,280
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Banners Broker HYIP ponzi scam

    Some bad news to share today I'm afraid.
    This email was received by a creditor this morning from Spergel:

    Hello,
    We have concluded our international tracing efforts and unfortunately have been unable to garner further recoveries.
    Given the limited funds recovered, we do not
    expect any money to be paid to creditors.

    A complete report will appear on our website in due course.
    Regards,
    msi Spergel inc., court-appointed receiver of Banners Broker International Limited.

  2. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Is Eireannach mise
    Posts
    1,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Banners Broker HYIP ponzi scam

    https://www.spergelcorporate.ca/img/...-redacted-.pdf
    Banners Broker International Limited | Spergel Corporate

    MOTION RECORD
    (returnable November 1, 2019)

    (e) This is a motion to vary the Mareva Order to enable the Receiver to enforce
    judgments against Kuldip Josun (“Josun”) and Rajiv Dixit, Dixit Holdings
    Inc., Dixit Consortium Inc., and Dreamscape Ventures Ltd. (collectively, the
    “Dixit Defendants”). The judgments total over $206 million. As further
    explained below, approximately ten bank accounts with balances totalling
    approximately $32,000 were caught by the Mareva Order.
    ...
    (o) On August 17, 2017, the Receiver obtained default judgment against Josun
    in the amount of Canadian currency sufficient to purchase USD$6,070,790.
    (p) The Dixit Defendants consented to a judgment in favour of the Receiver in
    the amount of $200 million. The consent judgment was obtained by the
    Receiver on July 25, 2018.
    (q) Neither Josun nor the Dixit Defendants have satisfied the respective
    judgments against them

  4. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •